Lahiri S, Mokashi A, Mulligan E, Nishino T
J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1981 Jul;51(1):55-61. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1981.51.1.55.
A quantitative comparison of the responses between aortic and carotid chemoreceptors to steady-state levels of arterial CO2 and O2 partial pressure was made in 35 cats anesthetized, paralyzed, and artificially ventilated. The measurements on the two receptors were made simultaneously in 6 cats and separately in 29 cats. The response of aortic chemoreceptors to a CO2 stimulus was a fraction of that of carotid chemoreceptors, and the response to hypoxia was relatively blunted. The differences between the two chemoreceptors are quantitative rather than qualitative. Since a low arterial CO2 partial pressure stimulus is known to attenuate the hypoxic response of carotid chemoreceptors, it is suggested that the low CO2 response of aortic body chemoreceptors is responsible for their blunted hypoxic response.
对35只麻醉、麻痹并进行人工通气的猫的主动脉化学感受器和颈动脉化学感受器对动脉血二氧化碳(CO₂)和氧(O₂)分压稳态水平的反应进行了定量比较。在6只猫中同时对两种感受器进行测量,在29只猫中分别进行测量。主动脉化学感受器对CO₂刺激的反应是颈动脉化学感受器的一部分,对缺氧的反应相对迟钝。两种化学感受器之间的差异是定量的而非定性的。由于已知低动脉血CO₂分压刺激会减弱颈动脉化学感受器的缺氧反应,因此有人提出主动脉体化学感受器的低CO₂反应是其缺氧反应迟钝的原因。