Leuner H
Z Psychosom Med Psychoanal. 1978 Oct-Dec;24(4):301-18.
The position of regression in the frame work of classical psychoanalysis is referred. Its term has been extended gradually since desolving out of the frame of psychopathology by Kris 1952 (Regression in the service of the Ego). Today regression can be understood as an ubiquitous phaenomenon in the individual and in social organism. Beyond the regression in the service of the ego (today in a more expended sense) regression stands in the service of adaptation and of recreation. Metapsychologically speaking regression can be considered as an at any time in latency readily kept mental reactionmatrix even in the "healthy" individuum. Ego-regression can manifest itself in diverse ego cernals with different grades of maturity and regressive tendencies. Partial regression is frequent and accompanied by reciprocal progression. The treatment of borderlines, basis disturbances and narcistic neuroses needs the empathetic but controlled regression of the psychoanalysist to the level of preverbal communication and to allow the patient a therapeutic regression. Psychoanalytic research on regression gives way to conceptualize advanced psychotherapeutic methods in border areas of psychoanalysis and should be promoted moreover.
经典精神分析框架中回归的位置被提及。自1952年克里斯(《自我服务的回归》)将其从精神病理学框架中分离出来后,其概念逐渐得到扩展。如今,回归可被理解为个体和社会有机体中普遍存在的现象。除了自我服务的回归(如今在更广泛的意义上),回归还服务于适应和娱乐。从元心理学角度讲,回归可被视为即使在“健康”个体中,任何时候都潜伏着的、随时可被激发的心理反应模式。自我回归可在不同成熟度和回归倾向的各种自我核心中表现出来。部分回归很常见,且伴随着相互进步。对边缘性障碍、基础障碍和自恋性神经症的治疗需要分析师以共情但可控的方式回归到前语言交流水平,并允许患者进行治疗性回归。精神分析对回归的研究有助于在精神分析边缘领域将先进的心理治疗方法概念化,而且应该得到推动。