• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

辐射防护理念:生物伦理问题与优先事项

Radiation protection philosophy: bioethical problems and priorities.

作者信息

Maxey M N

出版信息

Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1978 Sep;39(9):689-94. doi: 10.1080/0002889778507836.

DOI:10.1080/0002889778507836
PMID:727115
Abstract

The evolution of radiation protection philosophy over the past thirty years calls attention to an urgent need to review and revise current radiation control programs with respect to the ethical problems and priorities they reflect. One problem is the environmental crisis-mentality escalating already rising expectations in our affluent society about levels of safety. A second problem is the propriety or impropriety of using cost/benefit/risk quantifications in setting priorities in public health protection. A threefold ethical justification for risk-assessment methodology challenges our government regulatory agency system as presently chartered and operationally conducted.

摘要

过去三十年来辐射防护理念的演变促使人们迫切需要审视和修订当前的辐射控制计划,以关注其所反映的伦理问题和优先事项。一个问题是环境危机心态加剧了我们富裕社会中对安全水平本已不断上升的期望。第二个问题是在确定公共卫生防护的优先事项时使用成本/效益/风险量化方法是否恰当。风险评估方法的三重伦理依据对我们目前特许和运作的政府监管机构系统构成了挑战。

相似文献

1
Radiation protection philosophy: bioethical problems and priorities.辐射防护理念:生物伦理问题与优先事项
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1978 Sep;39(9):689-94. doi: 10.1080/0002889778507836.
2
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
3
[Radioactive materials in the environment--the need for minimizing their presence and standards for their limitation].[环境中的放射性物质——尽量减少其存在的必要性及其限制标准]
Schriftenr Ver Wasser Boden Lufthyg. 1985;63:7-16.
4
An overview of radiation safety regulatory recommendations and requirements.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999 Aug;47(4):469-74. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(199908)47:4<469::AID-CCD18>3.0.CO;2-X.
5
Radiation protection standards: their evolution from science to philosophy.辐射防护标准:从科学到理念的演变
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;115(1-4):16-22. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nci133.
6
Environmental radiation protection: philosophy, monitoring and standards.环境辐射防护:理念、监测与标准。
J Environ Radioact. 2004;72(1-2):65-73. doi: 10.1016/S0265-931X(03)00187-5.
7
The impact of the draft 2005 recommendations of ICRP on secondary derived regulatory values being considered by the US Department of Energy.国际放射防护委员会(ICRP)2005年建议草案对美国能源部正在考虑的二次导出监管值的影响。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2006;118(1):97-101. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nci320. Epub 2005 Aug 16.
8
[Topical problems of environmental protection in electric current generation with reference to the relation between environmental protection and radiation protection].
Strahlenschutz Forsch Prax. 1973;12:1-17.
9
Justification and radiology: some ethical considerations.理由与放射学:一些伦理考量
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2009 Jul;135(2):128-33. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncp041. Epub 2009 Mar 27.
10
Protecting people against radiation exposure in the event of a radiological attack. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.在发生放射性袭击时保护人们免受辐射照射。国际放射防护委员会的一份报告。
Ann ICRP. 2005;35(1):1-110, iii-iv. doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2005.01.001.