Klocke F J, Weinstein I R, Klocke J F, Ellis A K, Kraus D R, Mates R E, Canty J M, Anbar R D, Romanowski R R, Wallmeyer K W, Echt M P
J Clin Invest. 1981 Oct;68(4):970-80. doi: 10.1172/jci110351.
The proposal that diastolic coronary flow is regulated by an intramyocardial "back-pressure" that substantially exceeds coronary venous and ventricular diastolic pressures has been examined in an open-chest canine preparation in which instantaneous left circumflex pressure and flow could be followed to cessation of inflow during prolonged diastoles. Despite correlation coefficients consistently >0.90, pressure-flow data during individual diastoles were concave to the flow axis before and during pharmacologically induced maximum coronary vasodilation. Data were better fitted (P < 0.01) by second-order equations than by linear equations in >90% of cases. Second-order pressure-axis intercepts (P(f=0))(1) averaged 29+/-7 (SD) mm Hg before vasodilation and 15+/-2 mm Hg during vasodilation; left and right atrial pressures were always substantially lower (8+/-3 and 5+/-2 mm Hg before vasodilation and 8+/-2 and 4+/-1 mm Hg during dilation). Values of P(f=0) before vasodilation varied directly with levels of coronary inflow pressure. A modification of the experimental preparation in which diastolic circumflex pressure could be kept constant was used to evaluate the suggestion that P(f=0) measured during long diastoles are misleadingly high because of capacitive effects within the coronary circulation as inflow pressure decreases. Decreases in P(f=0) attributable to capacitive effects averaged only 5.9+/-3.0 mm Hg before vasodilation and were smaller during dilation. We conclude that P(f=0) is a quantitatively important determinant of coronary driving pressure and flow, resulting from both factors related to, and independent of, vasomotor tone. Adjustments of flow during changing physiological situations may involve significant changes in P(f=0) as well as in coronary resistance.
有一种观点认为,舒张期冠状动脉血流受心肌内“背压”调节,该背压显著超过冠状静脉压和心室舒张压。本研究在开胸犬实验模型中进行验证,在此模型中可连续监测左旋支冠状动脉的瞬时压力和血流,直至舒张期血流停止。尽管各个舒张期的压力-血流数据相关性系数始终>0.90,但在药物诱导的最大冠脉血管舒张前及舒张过程中,单个舒张期的压力-血流数据在血流轴方向呈凹形。在90%以上的情况下,用二阶方程比线性方程能更好地拟合数据(P<0.01)。血管舒张前二阶压力轴截距(P(f=0))(1)平均为29±7(标准差)mmHg,血管舒张时为15±2 mmHg;左、右心房压力始终显著更低(血管舒张前分别为8±3和5±2 mmHg,血管舒张时为8±2和4±1 mmHg)。血管舒张前P(f=0)值与冠状动脉流入压水平直接相关。采用一种改良实验模型,可使左旋支冠状动脉舒张期压力保持恒定,以评估下述观点,即长时间舒张期测量的P(f=0)因冠状动脉循环内的电容效应(随着流入压降低)而被误导性地高估。血管舒张前,因电容效应导致的P(f=0)降低平均仅为5.9±3.0 mmHg,血管舒张时降低幅度更小。我们得出结论,P(f=0)是冠状动脉驱动压力和血流的重要定量决定因素,它受血管舒缩张力相关及不相关的多种因素影响。生理状态改变时血流的调节可能涉及P(f=0)以及冠状动脉阻力的显著变化。