• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏监护病房收治标准的改进。

Improved criteria for admission to cardiac care units.

作者信息

Fuchs R, Scheidt S

出版信息

JAMA. 1981 Nov 6;246(18):2037-41.

PMID:7288989
Abstract

Patients requiring specialized cardiac care unit interventions (CCUIs) were identified from 414 consecutive admissions with known or suspected myocardial infarction (Ml). Cardiac care unit interventions included administration of lidocaine hydrochloride, atropine sulfate, sodium nitroprusside, or vasopressors; Swan-Ganz or arterial catheterization; insertion of temporary pacemaker; and electroshock. Almost all interventions occurred in a high-risk group that had one or more of three findings: (1) ongoing chest pain, (2) pulmonary rales, or (3) one or more ventricular premature contractions (VPCs) on 12-lead ECG. Of 306 high-risk patients, 41% received at least one CCUI, and 4% died in the CCU. In contrast, of the 108 low-risk patients with none of the three criteria, only 6% received any CCUI, and none died in the CCU. This study suggests that patients who do not have ongoing pain, congestive heart failure, of VPCs when first evaluated have a very low risk of early complications and may not require intensive care.

摘要

从414例已知或疑似心肌梗死(MI)的连续入院患者中识别出需要心脏重症监护病房干预(CCUIs)的患者。心脏重症监护病房干预措施包括给予盐酸利多卡因、硫酸阿托品、硝普钠或血管加压药;放置 Swan-Ganz 导管或动脉导管;插入临时起搏器;以及电击。几乎所有干预措施都发生在一个高危组中,该组有以下三项发现中的一项或多项:(1)持续胸痛,(2)肺部啰音,或(3)12导联心电图上有一个或多个室性早搏(VPCs)。在306例高危患者中,41%接受了至少一次CCUI,4%在心脏重症监护病房死亡。相比之下,在108例不符合这三项标准的低危患者中,只有6%接受了任何CCUI,且无人在心脏重症监护病房死亡。这项研究表明,首次评估时没有持续疼痛、充血性心力衰竭或室性早搏的患者早期并发症风险非常低,可能不需要重症监护。

相似文献

1
Improved criteria for admission to cardiac care units.心脏监护病房收治标准的改进。
JAMA. 1981 Nov 6;246(18):2037-41.
2
Triage practice guideline for patients hospitalized with congestive heart failure: improving the effectiveness of the coronary care unit.充血性心力衰竭住院患者的分诊实践指南:提高冠心病监护病房的有效性
Am J Med. 1993 May;94(5):483-490. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(93)90082-Z.
3
Coronary care unit utilization in Hamilton, Ontario, a city of 375,000 people.安大略省汉密尔顿市(人口37.5万)冠心病监护病房的使用情况。
Can J Cardiol. 1988 Jan-Feb;4(1):25-32.
4
Clinical profile of patients admitted to the coronary care unit with possible myocardial infarction without diagnostic ECG and/or enzyme changes.入住冠心病监护病房、可能发生心肌梗死但心电图和/或酶学无诊断性改变的患者的临床特征。
East Afr Med J. 1993 Dec;70(12):777-81.
5
Prognostic factors in acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死的预后因素
S Afr Med J. 1977 Sep 17;52(13):511-4.
6
Unexpected readmissions to the coronary-care unit during recovery from acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死恢复期间意外再次入住冠心病监护病房。
N Engl J Med. 1981 Mar 12;304(11):625-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198103123041101.
7
The course of patients with suspected myocardial infarction. The identification of low-risk patients for early transfer from intensive care.疑似心肌梗死患者的病程。识别适合从重症监护病房早期转出的低风险患者。
N Engl J Med. 1980 Apr 24;302(17):943-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198004243021704.
8
Risk identification at the time of admission to coronary care unit in patients with suspected myocardial infarction.疑似心肌梗死患者入住冠心病监护病房时的风险识别。
Am Heart J. 1988 Nov;116(5 Pt 1):1212-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(88)90442-5.
9
Are the American College of Cardiology/Emergency Cardiac Care (ACC/ECC) guidelines useful in triaging patients to telemetry units?美国心脏病学会/心脏急救护理(ACC/ECC)指南在将患者分诊至遥测监护病房时有用吗?
Acute Card Care. 2006;8(3):155-60. doi: 10.1080/17482940600934192.
10
Are we appropriately triaging patients with unstable angina?我们对不稳定型心绞痛患者进行的分诊是否恰当?
Am Heart J. 2005 Apr;149(4):613-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.09.035.

引用本文的文献

1
Hearts too good to die: an evaluation of coronary care.好心得好报:冠心病监护的评估。
Can Fam Physician. 1984 Nov;30:2345-52.
2
Evaluating a new graphical ordinal logit method (GOLDminer) in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction utilizing clinical features and laboratory data.利用临床特征和实验室数据,评估一种用于诊断心肌梗死的新型图形有序logit方法(GOLDminer)。
Yale J Biol Med. 1999 Jul-Aug;72(4):259-68.
3
Clinical Features of Emergency Department Patients Presenting with Symptoms Suggestive of Acute Cardiac Ischemia: A Multicenter Study.
急诊科出现提示急性心肌缺血症状患者的临床特征:一项多中心研究
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 1998 Jul;6(1):63-74. doi: 10.1023/A:1008876322599.
4
Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) and Medicare reimbursement.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE II)及医疗保险报销。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1984;Suppl(Suppl):91-105.
5
Outcome of patients discharged from a coronary care unit with a diagnosis of "chest pain not yet diagnosed".诊断为“胸痛待查”的冠心病监护病房出院患者的结局
CMAJ. 1996 Sep 1;155(5):541-6.
6
Evaluating chest pain in the emergency department.在急诊科评估胸痛。
West J Med. 1993 Jul;159(1):61-8.
7
Electrocardiograms and decision aids in coronary care triage: the truth, but not the whole truth.
J Gen Intern Med. 1987 Jan-Feb;2(1):67-70. doi: 10.1007/BF02596257.
8
'Ruling out' myocardial infarction in the coronary care unit.在冠心病监护病房中“排除”心肌梗死
West J Med. 1988 May;148(5):555-60.
9
Chest pain of esophageal origin.食管源性胸痛
J Gen Intern Med. 1989 Mar-Apr;4(2):151-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02602358.
10
Reducing unnecessary coronary care unit admissions: a comparison of three decision aids.
J Gen Intern Med. 1990 Nov-Dec;5(6):474-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02600872.