Putnam L R
Percept Mot Skills. 1981 Aug;53(1):235-8. doi: 10.2466/pms.1981.53.1.235.
With mental ages partialled out, the correlation of -0.25 between perceptual error scores of 102 remedial readers on the Minnesota Percepto-Diagnostic Test and Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests was not significant. Intra-group analysis of scores on reproduction showed that those in the organic classification made significantly more errors on the horizontal arrow figure. Inter-group analysis indicated significant differences among primary, secondary, and organic classifications with the organic producing the most errors on the horizontal arrow figure. Intra-group analysis of brain-damage indicators yielded no significant differences; inter-group analysis showed that those assigned the organic classification made significantly more errors in distortion of dots.
在排除心理年龄因素后,102名补习阅读者在明尼苏达感知诊断测试和伍德科克阅读能力测试中的感知错误分数之间的-0.25相关性并不显著。对再现分数的组内分析表明,器质性分类中的受试者在水平箭头图形上犯的错误明显更多。组间分析表明,初级、次级和器质性分类之间存在显著差异,器质性分类的受试者在水平箭头图形上犯的错误最多。对脑损伤指标的组内分析没有产生显著差异;组间分析表明,被归为器质性分类的受试者在点的变形方面犯的错误明显更多。