Holland J M, Fuller G B, Barth C E
J Clin Psychol. 1982 Jan;38(1):159-63. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198201)38:1<159::aid-jclp2270380126>3.0.co;2-j.
Examined the performance of 64 children on the Minnesota Percepto-Diagnostic test (MPD) who were diagnosed as either Brain-Damaged (BD) or emotionally impaired Non-Brain-Damaged (NBD). There were 31 children in the NBD group and 33 in the BD group. The MPD T-score and Actuarial Table significantly differentiated between the two groups. Seventy-four percent of the combined BD-NBD groups were identified correctly. Additional discriminant analysis on this sample yielded combined BD-NBD groups classification rates that ranged from 77% with the MPD variables Separation of Circle-Diamond (SPCD), Distortion of Circle-Diamond (DCD) and Distortion of Dots (DD) to 83% with the WISC-R three IQ scores plus the MPD T-score, SPCD and DD. The MPD T-score and Actuarial Table (MPD Two-Step Diagnosis) appeared to generalize to other populations more readily than discriminant analysis formulae, which tend to be sensitive to the samples from which they are derived.
对64名被诊断为脑损伤(BD)或情感障碍非脑损伤(NBD)的儿童进行了明尼苏达感知诊断测试(MPD)表现的研究。NBD组有31名儿童,BD组有33名儿童。MPD T分数和精算表在两组之间有显著差异。BD-NBD合并组中有74%被正确识别。对该样本进行的额外判别分析得出,BD-NBD合并组的分类率从使用MPD变量圆菱形分离(SPCD)、圆菱形变形(DCD)和点变形(DD)时的77%到使用韦氏儿童智力量表修订版(WISC-R)的三个智商分数加上MPD T分数、SPCD和DD时的83%不等。MPD T分数和精算表(MPD两步诊断)似乎比判别分析公式更容易推广到其他人群,判别分析公式往往对其来源样本敏感。