Kawakami K, Katsuyama N, Fukuda Y, Mori Y, Shimada T, Iikura Y
Clin Nucl Med. 1981 Oct;6(10):463-7. doi: 10.1097/00003072-198110000-00002.
In an attempt to compare inhalation methods in detecting abnormal patterns of ventilation, the following four techniques were applied in 12 asthmatic patients: spontaneous respiration with a Kr-81m gas-air mixture (SP technique); serial inhalation of a Kr-81m gas-air mixture from the level of residual volume to total lung capacity (VC technique); bolus inhalation of 10 ml or Kr-81m gas from the level of residual volume, followed by air, to total lung capacity (RV technique); bolus inhalation of 10 ml of Kr-81m gas from the level of functional residual capacity, followed by air, to total lung capacity (FRC technique). Before exercise, abnormalities were detected by the RV and FRC techniques, but no abnormalities were detected by SP and VC techniques. On studies done after exercise, the abnormalities were detected by all the described techniques. However, they were best demonstrated by the RV technique and shown least well by the VC method.
为了比较检测通气异常模式的吸入方法,对12名哮喘患者应用了以下四种技术:用氪 - 81m气体 - 空气混合物进行自主呼吸(SP技术);从残气量水平到肺总量连续吸入氪 - 81m气体 - 空气混合物(VC技术);从残气量水平推注吸入10ml氪 - 81m气体,随后吸入空气至肺总量(RV技术);从功能残气量水平推注吸入10ml氪 - 81m气体,随后吸入空气至肺总量(FRC技术)。运动前,RV和FRC技术检测到异常,但SP和VC技术未检测到异常。在运动后进行的研究中,所有上述技术均检测到异常。然而,RV技术对异常的显示最佳,而VC方法显示最差。