Martin A, Wu P L, Adjei A, Beerbower A, Prausnitz J M
J Pharm Sci. 1981 Nov;70(11):1260-4. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600701120.
A multiple regression method using Hansen partial solubility parameters, delta D, delta p, and delta H, was used to reproduce the solubilities of naphthalene in pure polar and nonpolar solvents and to predict its solubility in untested solvents. The method, called the extended Hansen approach, was compared with the extended Hildebrand solubility approach and the universal-functional-group-activity-coefficient (UNIFAC) method. The Hildebrand regular solution theory was also used to calculate naphthalene solubility. Naphthalene, an aromatic molecule having no side chains or functional groups, is "well-behaved', i.e., its solubility in active solvents known to interact with drug molecules is fairly regular. Because of its simplicity, naphthalene is a suitable solute with which to initiate the difficult study of solubility phenomena. The three methods tested (Hildebrand regular solution theory was introduced only for comparison of solubilities in regular solution) yielded similar results, reproducing naphthalene solubilities within approximately 30% of literature values. In some cases, however, the error was considerably greater. The UNIFAC calculation is superior in that it requires only the solute's heat of fusion, the melting point, and a knowledge of chemical structures of solute and solvent. The extended Hansen and extended Hildebrand methods need experimental solubility data on which to carry out regression analysis. The extended Hansen approach was the method of second choice because of its adaptability to solutes and solvents from various classes. Sample calculations are included to illustrate methods of predicting solubilities in untested solvents at various temperatures. The UNIFAC method was successful in this regard.
采用一种多元回归方法,该方法使用汉森部分溶解度参数δD、δp和δH,来重现萘在纯极性和非极性溶剂中的溶解度,并预测其在未经测试的溶剂中的溶解度。这种方法被称为扩展汉森方法,与扩展希尔德布兰德溶解度方法和通用官能团活度系数(UNIFAC)方法进行了比较。希尔德布兰德正规溶液理论也被用于计算萘的溶解度。萘是一种没有侧链或官能团的芳香分子,其“行为良好”,即它在已知与药物分子相互作用的活性溶剂中的溶解度相当规律。由于其简单性,萘是一种合适的溶质,可用于启动对溶解度现象的艰难研究。所测试的三种方法(引入希尔德布兰德正规溶液理论仅用于比较正规溶液中的溶解度)得出了相似的结果,重现的萘溶解度在文献值的约30%范围内。然而,在某些情况下,误差要大得多。UNIFAC计算的优势在于它只需要溶质的熔化热、熔点以及溶质和溶剂的化学结构知识。扩展汉森方法和扩展希尔德布兰德方法需要实验溶解度数据来进行回归分析。扩展汉森方法是第二选择的方法,因为它对各类溶质和溶剂具有适应性。文中包含了示例计算,以说明预测不同温度下未经测试的溶剂中溶解度的方法。在这方面,UNIFAC方法是成功的。