• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

南县的医疗保健决策

Health care decision making in Southern County.

作者信息

Thacker S B, Osborne C, Salber E J

出版信息

J Community Health. 1978 Summer;3(4):347-56. doi: 10.1007/BF01498509.

DOI:10.1007/BF01498509
PMID:730843
Abstract

We combine two standard approaches to analyze power and influence in health policy formulation within a moderately large county in the south. Intrinsic methodologic weaknesses are discussed and several conclusions are drawn regarding power in the health care sector of that community. The most significant finding is the shift in power over time, away from the individuals to committees and health care organizations. The ignorance of most physicians about the broader health care issues that affect the community was reflected in their lack of recognition by others in the community as influential decision makers. The insular relationship of the university to the rest of the community was also noted. Past racial politics had a continuing effect on later health policy formulation. These findings are discussed in light of current and past issues. Because we had promised confidentiality to the persons we interviewed, fictitious names were given to the county, the institutions, and the interviewees.

摘要

我们结合两种标准方法,对美国南部一个中等规模的县卫生政策制定中的权力和影响力进行分析。文中讨论了内在的方法学弱点,并就该社区医疗保健部门的权力得出了几个结论。最显著的发现是,随着时间的推移,权力从个人转移到了委员会和医疗保健组织。大多数医生对影响社区的更广泛医疗保健问题的忽视,体现在社区其他成员未将他们视为有影响力的决策者。还指出了该大学与社区其他部分之间的孤立关系。过去的种族政治对后来的卫生政策制定产生了持续影响。结合当前和过去的问题对这些发现进行了讨论。由于我们已向受访者承诺保密,因此对该县、各机构和受访者均使用了化名。

相似文献

1
Health care decision making in Southern County.南县的医疗保健决策
J Community Health. 1978 Summer;3(4):347-56. doi: 10.1007/BF01498509.
2
Regulating ethics committees in health care institutions -- is it time?规范医疗机构中的伦理委员会——是时候了吗?
MD Law Rev. 1991;50(3):746-97.
3
Women as decision and policy makers. Asia.女性作为决策者和政策制定者。亚洲。
JOICFP News. 1995 Sep(254):3.
4
The dynamics of capital growth for hospital management.
Hosp Prog. 1975 Apr;56(4):54-7/104.
5
Technology and health care decision making-conceptualizing the process for societal informed consent.
Med Care. 1974 Oct;12(10):845-59. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197410000-00004.
6
Resource requirements for health care organizations.医疗保健机构的资源需求。
Health Care Manage Rev. 1979 Fall;4(4):65-71.
7
Netherlands: rational choices in health care.荷兰:医疗保健中的理性选择。
Lancet. 1992 Jul 25;340(8813):228-9. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)90483-j.
8
The voluntary health sector: some reflections.志愿卫生部门:一些思考。
Health Millions. 1993 Jun;1(3):2-5.
9
The potential of health sector non-governmental organizations: policy options.卫生部门非政府组织的潜力:政策选择
Health Policy Plan. 1994 Mar;9(1):14-24. doi: 10.1093/heapol/9.1.14.
10
Abortion and the law: the impact on hospital policy of the Roe and Doe decisions.堕胎与法律:罗诉韦德案和多伊诉博尔顿案的判决对医院政策的影响
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1976 Fall;1(3):319-37. doi: 10.1215/03616878-1-3-319.

本文引用的文献

1
A study of the power structure of the medical community.医学共同体权力结构研究
Med Care. 1974 Jan;12(1):1-12. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197401000-00001.