• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭规模与子女质量

Family size and the quality of children.

作者信息

Blake J

出版信息

Demography. 1981 Nov;18(4):421-42.

PMID:7308532
Abstract

If couples decide to have fewer children in order to achieve higher "quality" offspring, are they correct in assuming that the quality of children bears an important and inverse relation to family size? If they are correct, how does number of children operate to affect individual quality? This research (using U.S. whites primarily) takes educational attainment (among adults) and college plans (among youngsters) as the principal indicators of quality, but also directs some attention to measures of intelligence. The analysis supports the "dilution model" (on average, the more children the lower the quality of each child) and indicates that only children do not suffer from lack of siblings, and that other last-borns are not handicapped by a "teaching deficit." Number of siblings (relative to other background variables) is found to have an important detrimental impact on child quality--an impact compounded by the fact that, when couples are at a stage in life to make family-size decisions, most background factors (however important to the quality of their children) are no longer readily manipulable. A special path analysis of college plans among boys uses a modification of Sewell's Wisconsin Model as its base. The results show that number of siblings is a negative influence on intervening variables affecting college plans. In general, the research documents the unfavorable consequences for individual siblings of high fertility, even in a country that is (at least for whites) as socially, economically, and politically advantaged as the United States.

摘要

如果夫妻为了生育出“质量”更高的后代而决定少生孩子,那么他们认为孩子的质量与家庭规模呈重要的反比关系这一假设正确吗?如果他们是正确的,孩子的数量是如何影响个体质量的呢?这项研究(主要以美国白人作为研究对象)将教育程度(针对成年人)和大学计划(针对青少年)作为质量的主要指标,但也对智力测量给予了一定关注。分析支持了“稀释模型”(平均而言,孩子越多,每个孩子的质量越低),并表明独生子女不会因缺少兄弟姐妹而受影响,其他最小的孩子也不会因“教育不足”而处于劣势。研究发现,兄弟姐妹的数量(相对于其他背景变量)对孩子的质量有重要的不利影响——这种影响因以下事实而加剧:当夫妻处于做出家庭规模决策的人生阶段时,大多数背景因素(无论对孩子的质量多么重要)都不再容易控制。一项针对男孩大学计划的特殊路径分析以对休厄尔的威斯康星模型的修正版本为基础。结果表明,兄弟姐妹的数量对影响大学计划的中间变量有负面影响。总体而言,该研究证明了高生育率对个体兄弟姐妹产生的不利后果,即使是在一个(至少对白人而言)在社会、经济和政治方面像美国一样具有优势的国家。

相似文献

1
Family size and the quality of children.家庭规模与子女质量
Demography. 1981 Nov;18(4):421-42.
2
Age at first childbirth and later poverty.首次生育年龄与后期贫困。
J Res Adolesc. 1993;3(4):393-422. doi: 10.1207/s15327795jra0304_5.
3
Family size and child development.家庭规模与儿童发展。
Draper Fund Rep. 1982 Dec(11):19-22.
4
Family size, birth order, and intelligence in a large South American sample.一个南美洲大样本中的家庭规模、出生顺序与智力
Am Educ Res J. 1978 Summer;15(3):399-416.
5
Fertility decisions and desires in Bangladesh: an econometric investigation.孟加拉国的生育决策与意愿:一项计量经济学调查
Bangladesh Dev Stud. 1976 Jul;4(3):329-50.
6
[Socioeconomic aspects of fertility in an urban African setting: Abidjan].[非洲城市环境中生育的社会经济方面:阿比让]
CIRES Cah Ivoir Rech Econ Soc. 1981 Mar-Jun(28-29):3-35.
7
Determinants of couple agreement in U.S. fertility decisions.美国生育决策中夫妻共识的决定因素。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1994 Jul-Aug;26(4):169-73.
8
A multi-level analysis of the determinants of fertility in the four regions of Thailand.泰国四个地区生育率决定因素的多层次分析。
Asia Pac Popul J. 1992 Mar;7(1):51-64.
9
Changes in fertility patterns can improve child survival in Southeast Asia.生育模式的改变能够提高东南亚地区儿童的存活率。
Asia Pac Pop Policy. 1993 Dec(27):1-4.
10
Number of siblings and educational attainment.兄弟姐妹数量和教育程度。
Science. 1989 Jul 7;245(4913):32-6. doi: 10.1126/science.2740913.

引用本文的文献

1
Wealth-based inequalities in early childhood development (ECD) outcomes in Bangladesh: A decomposition analysis using MICS 2019.孟加拉国儿童早期发展(ECD)成果中基于财富的不平等:使用2019年多指标类集调查的分解分析
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;5(7):e0004774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004774. eCollection 2025.
2
The impact of only-child status on adolescent mental health: a multi-center cross-sectional study using propensity score matching in Western China.独生子女身份对青少年心理健康的影响:一项在中国西部采用倾向得分匹配法的多中心横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jun 7;25(1):2140. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23383-y.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of wartime starvation in Holland upon pregnancy and its product.荷兰战时饥荒对妊娠及其产物的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1947 Apr;53(4):599-608. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(47)90277-9.
2
Effects of maternal under nutrition upon the newborn infant in Holland (1944-1945).荷兰1944 - 1945年母亲营养不足对新生儿的影响。
J Pediatr. 1947 Mar;30(3):229-43. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(47)80158-1.
3
Family configuration and intelligence.家庭结构与智力
Latent profiles of problematic internet use and their six-month subsequent psychopathology outcomes.
问题性互联网使用的潜在概况及其六个月后的精神病理学结果。
Addict Behav Rep. 2025 Apr 13;21:100607. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2025.100607. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
A Study on the Differences in Parental Educational Expectations and Adolescents' Academic and Psychological Development: A Comparative Analysis of Only Children and Non-Only Children.父母教育期望与青少年学业及心理发展差异的研究:独生子女与非独生子女的比较分析
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 21;15(4):402. doi: 10.3390/bs15040402.
5
Zero-Dose Vaccination of Self-Paid Vaccines Among Migrant and Left-Behind Children in China: Evidence from Zhejiang and Henan Provinces.中国流动儿童和留守儿童自费疫苗零剂次接种情况:来自浙江和河南的证据
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Jan 24;13(2):118. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13020118.
6
Association Between Family Planning and Early Childhood Development: Secondary Analysis of the 2018 Turkey Demographic and Health Surveys.计划生育与儿童早期发展之间的关联:对2018年土耳其人口与健康调查的二次分析
Children (Basel). 2025 Feb 12;12(2):220. doi: 10.3390/children12020220.
7
The influence of parental burnout on middle school students' academic achievement: moderated mediation effect.父母职业倦怠对中学生学业成绩的影响:调节中介效应
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 3;16:1530289. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1530289. eCollection 2025.
8
Differential Impact of Parental Practices and Parental Emotional Clarity on Child Symptoms in Single-Child vs. Multiple-Child Divorced Families.独生子女与多子女离异家庭中父母教养方式及父母情绪清晰度对儿童症状的差异影响
Children (Basel). 2024 Dec 3;11(12):1481. doi: 10.3390/children11121481.
9
Parent-child interaction frequency: associations with age, sibling presence, and child health.亲子互动频率:与年龄、兄弟姐妹的存在及儿童健康的关联
Pediatr Res. 2024 Nov 14. doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03727-x.
10
The Effects of War-Related Stress on Human Development: Differences in Body Proportions of Polish Women Born Before and During World War II.战争相关压力对人类发育的影响:二战前及二战期间出生的波兰女性身体比例差异
Am J Hum Biol. 2025 Jan;37(1):e24175. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.24175. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
Science. 1976 Apr 16;192(4236):227-36. doi: 10.1126/science.192.4236.227.
4
Family size: implicit policies and assumed psychological outcomes.家庭规模:隐性政策与假定的心理结果。
Fam Plann Resume. 1977;1(1):145-8.
5
Social class, parental encouragement, and educational aspirations.社会阶层、父母的鼓励与教育抱负。
AJS. 1968 Mar;73(5):559-72. doi: 10.1086/224530.
6
Parents' education and children's educational aspirations and achievements.父母的教育程度与子女的教育期望和成就。
Am Sociol Rev. 1968 Apr;33(2):191-209.
7
Personality in primary school children. 3. Family background.小学生的个性。3. 家庭背景。
Br J Educ Psychol. 1970 Jun;40(2):117-31. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1970.tb02112.x.
8
Nutrition and mental performance.营养与心理表现。
Science. 1972 Nov 17;178(4062):708-13. doi: 10.1126/science.178.4062.708.
9
Birth order, family size, and intelligence.出生顺序、家庭规模与智力
Science. 1973 Dec 14;182(4117):1096-101. doi: 10.1126/science.182.4117.1096.
10
Birth order: a critical review.出生顺序:一项批判性综述。
Sociometry. 1972 Sep;35(3):411-39.