Bregman N J, McAllister H A
Int J Neurosci. 1981;14(3-4):205-10. doi: 10.3109/00207458108985834.
In a 2 x 3 factorial design, 44 college students were assigned the task of either increasing or decreasing their hand skin temperature, receiving either suggestions, pseudo-suggestions, or no suggestions (response-specific instructions only). Subjects receiving suggestions heard imagery phrases related to increasing or decreasing hand skin temperature; subjects in the pseudo-suggestion condition heard phrases related to electronics; subjects in the response-specific condition were told only to increase or decrease their skin temperature prior to training. All subjects participated in three training sessions. Analyses of the third session indicated a significant main effect for temperature direction and a significant interaction effect. A marginally significant main effect for suggestion was obtained. The results suggest that the ability of a subject to regulate hand skin temperature is influenced by the combination of required direction of change and type of suggestion. The data support the notion that pseudo-suggestions may act as a distractor which disrupts the ability of a subject to control hand skin temperature in both the increase and decrease directions.
在一项2×3析因设计中,44名大学生被分配了增加或降低手部皮肤温度的任务,他们分别接受建议、伪建议或无建议(仅特定反应指令)。接受建议的受试者听到与增加或降低手部皮肤温度相关的意象短语;处于伪建议条件下的受试者听到与电子设备相关的短语;处于特定反应条件下的受试者在训练前仅被告知增加或降低皮肤温度。所有受试者都参加了三次训练课程。对第三次课程的分析表明,温度方向有显著的主效应,且存在显著的交互效应。获得了建议的边缘显著主效应。结果表明,受试者调节手部皮肤温度的能力受到所需变化方向和建议类型的组合的影响。数据支持这样一种观点,即伪建议可能起到干扰作用,破坏受试者在增加和降低两个方向上控制手部皮肤温度的能力。