Heagy W E, Neville D M
J Biol Chem. 1981 Dec 25;256(24):12788-92.
In an attempt to gain an understanding of the mechanism by which toxins enter cells, we have analyzed the intoxication of diphtheria toxin in the toxin-resistant L cell and compared these results with those previously reported for toxin-sensitive HeLa and KB cells (Uchida, T., Pappenheimer, A. M., Jr., and Harper, A. A. (1973) J. Biol. Chem. 248, 3845-3850; Moehring, J. M., and Moehring, T. J. (1976) Infect. Immun. 13, 221-228). The inactivation of protein synthesis in diphtheria toxin-treated L cells is characterized by first order inactivation kinetics and a concentration-dependent lag phase. The log rate of inactivation of protein synthesis when plotted versus toxin concentration yields a complex hyperbola with a saturable component detected in the range of 5 to 10 X 10(-5) M. We conclude that the intoxication of L cells by diphtheria toxin in the range of 10(-8) to 5 X 10(-6) M occurs via a saturable process and that the saturable component probably represents a plasma membrane toxin receptor with an affinity 200-fold lower than that found in sensitive HeLa cells. Since L cells require a 10(4)- to 10(5)-fold higher toxin dose than HeLa cells, a 200-fold affinity difference cannot fully explain the resistance of L cells to diphtheria toxin. In addition, L cells must have either fewer toxin receptors or a deficiency in the transport step(s). Because toxin-exposed L cells in contrast to sensitive cells exhibit different behavior with respect to pH and pH reversal of NH4Cl protection, a deficiency in the transport step is considered the more likely case.
为了了解毒素进入细胞的机制,我们分析了抗毒素的L细胞中白喉毒素的中毒情况,并将这些结果与先前报道的毒素敏感的HeLa细胞和KB细胞的结果进行了比较(内田,T.,帕彭海默,A.M.,Jr.,和哈珀,A.A.(1973年)《生物化学杂志》248,3845 - 3850;莫林,J.M.,和莫林,T.J.(1976年)《感染与免疫》13,221 - 228)。白喉毒素处理的L细胞中蛋白质合成的失活具有一级失活动力学和浓度依赖性延迟期的特征。当绘制蛋白质合成失活的对数速率与毒素浓度的关系图时,得到一条复杂的双曲线,在5至10×10⁻⁵ M范围内检测到一个饱和成分。我们得出结论,在10⁻⁸至5×10⁻⁶ M范围内,白喉毒素使L细胞中毒是通过一个可饱和的过程发生的,并且该饱和成分可能代表一种质膜毒素受体,其亲和力比在敏感的HeLa细胞中发现的低200倍。由于L细胞所需的毒素剂量比HeLa细胞高10⁴至10⁵倍,200倍的亲和力差异不能完全解释L细胞对白喉毒素的抗性。此外,L细胞要么毒素受体较少,要么在转运步骤中存在缺陷。因为与敏感细胞相比,暴露于毒素的L细胞在pH值和NH₄Cl保护的pH反转方面表现出不同的行为,所以认为转运步骤存在缺陷的可能性更大。