Shibasaki H, Yamashita Y, Motomura S
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1978 Dec;41(12):1078-83. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.41.12.1078.
Suppression of congenital nystagmus by eyelid closure was studied by electrooculography in four cases under various conditions in order to elucidate whether the suppression is caused by blocking of fixation or not. The nystagmus persisted in the light as well as in the dark provided that the eyes were kept open. Frenzel's glasses did not suppress the nystagmus except for one case in whom jerky nystagmus was attenuated. In the other cases, only voluntary lid closure suppressed the nystagmus. Passive lid closure while the patient attempted to keep eyes open did not suppress the nystagmus except in one case. Reflex eyelid closure by glabellar tap did not suppress the nystagmus in spite of the occurrence of Bell's phenomenon. Passive eyelid opening while the patient attempted to keep eyes closed, on the other hand, did not reproduce the nystagmus. The suppression of congenital nystagmus by lid closure, at least in some cases, seems to be related to the voluntary effort to keep eyes closed but not specifically to blocking of fixation.
为了阐明先天性眼球震颤的抑制是否由注视阻断引起,我们通过眼电图对4例患者在各种情况下闭眼对先天性眼球震颤的抑制作用进行了研究。只要眼睛保持睁开,眼球震颤在明处和暗处都会持续。除了1例急跳性眼球震颤减弱的病例外,Frenzel眼镜并不能抑制眼球震颤。在其他病例中,只有主动闭眼才能抑制眼球震颤。当患者试图睁开眼睛时被动闭眼,除1例病例外,均不能抑制眼球震颤。尽管出现了贝尔现象,但轻叩眉间引起的反射性闭眼并不能抑制眼球震颤。另一方面,当患者试图闭眼时被动睁眼,并不会再现眼球震颤。至少在某些情况下,闭眼对先天性眼球震颤的抑制似乎与主动闭眼的努力有关,而不是与注视阻断有特定关系。