Haller O
Percept Mot Skills. 1981 Oct;53(2):591-603. doi: 10.2466/pms.1981.53.2.591.
In a series of five experiments the referencing function of spatial structures was investigated. The problem was (a) to determine whether subjects' effective frames of reference and their object figures could be experimentally identified, (b) to determine whether the analyses developed for this purpose were adequate, and (c) to determine some conditions of frames of reference. Graduate and undergraduate students were asked to reconstruct and to recall multiply-embedded figures viewed earlier. In these figures the spatial orientation of the figure elements was manipulated. Both reconstruction and recall errors were analyzed to identify subjects' effective frames of reference and their object figures. A single-subject design was used throughout. Frames of reference and their objects could be identified in Exp. 1. This experiment also showed the appropriateness of the analyses. Exp. 2 indicated that embedding figures provide one condition for identifying frames of reference. Exps. 3 to 5 demonstrated that changes in element figures, measurement, and reduction of trials and number of elements did not eliminate frames of reference. Differences in types of frames of reference were found. These differences were interpreted to indicate that some subjects use content, others formal schema (referents) to evaluate spatial orientation.
在一系列五个实验中,对空间结构的参照功能进行了研究。问题在于:(a)确定是否能通过实验识别出受试者的有效参照系及其目标图形;(b)确定为此目的所开展的分析是否充分;(c)确定参照系的一些条件。研究生和本科生被要求重构并回忆之前看过的多重嵌入图形。在这些图形中,图形元素的空间方向受到了操控。对重构和回忆错误进行分析,以识别受试者的有效参照系及其目标图形。整个过程采用单受试者设计。在实验1中可以识别出参照系及其目标。该实验还表明了分析方法的适用性。实验2表明,嵌入图形为识别参照系提供了一种条件。实验3至5证明,元素图形的变化、测量以及试验次数和元素数量的减少并未消除参照系。发现了参照系类型的差异。这些差异被解释为表明一些受试者使用内容,另一些受试者使用形式图式(参照物)来评估空间方向。