Ornstein A
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1981 Dec;4(3):435-53.
The conceptualization of childhood psychopathology is greatly aided when the stability and cohesiveness of the self are used as overriding points of orientation in the organization of clinical data. In children, self-cohesion, which is experienced as vigor, enthusiasm, and pleasure in the body-mind-self, depends on the phase-appropriate responses of the environment to the child's narcissistic developmental needs: mirroring and merger with the idealized selfobject. Since these selfobject responses depend on the empathic capacities of the child's psychological environment (primarily the parents), the development of parental empathy and the vicissitudes of its maintenance have been given special emphasis in this paper. The diagnosis of self-pathology in childhood has far-reaching consequences for the treatment of the child and his psychological environment. Recognizing the parents as selfobjects provides a conceptual bridge between the intrapsychic and the interpersonal in the treatment of children whose self is still in the process of evolving in relationship to their psychological environment. The active involvement of the parents in the treatment of a young child is supported by the now repeatedly made observation that patients who establish selfobject transferences in the course of their analyses are able to utilize the analyst's selfobject functions for belated structure building by the transmuting internalization of these functions. During childhood this structure-building potential can be remobilized within the child's own psychological environment. The clinical vignettes were chosen from the three representative age groups in childhood: preschool, latency, and adolescence. These vignettes were not intended to demonstrate "typical" manifestations of self-pathology at the various developmental phases. Rather, they were intended to demonstrate that the theory of the self as it develops within its psychological (selfobject) environment provides the child therapist with a theoretical tool which facilitates the understanding of those psychological conditions which- on a depth-psychological rather than on a descriptive level-could not readily be categorized either as a neurotic or a psychotic conditions. Since parental empathy is the sine qua non for the execution of parental self-object functions, the remobilization of these functions will depend on the parents' ability to become empathic toward the now symptomatic child. This may require the treatment of one or both parents, since this capacity cannot be "grafted" onto the parents' personalities: these are capacities that have to become the expressions of their own nuclear self. Parental selfobject functions are active functions and have to be differentiated from the processes of identification...
当自我的稳定性和凝聚力被用作组织临床数据的首要导向点时,对儿童精神病理学的概念化有很大帮助。在儿童中,自我凝聚表现为身心自我的活力、热情和愉悦,它取决于环境对儿童自恋发展需求的阶段适应性反应:与理想化自体客体的镜像反映和融合。由于这些自体客体反应取决于儿童心理环境(主要是父母)的共情能力,本文特别强调了父母共情的发展及其维持的变迁。儿童期自我病理学的诊断对儿童及其心理环境的治疗有着深远影响。将父母视为自体客体为治疗那些自我仍在与其心理环境关系中不断演变的儿童,在心理内部和人际之间提供了一个概念桥梁。父母积极参与幼儿治疗得到了反复观察结果的支持,即在分析过程中建立自体客体转移的患者能够通过这些功能的转化内化,利用分析师的自体客体功能进行迟来的结构构建。在童年时期,这种结构构建潜力可以在儿童自身的心理环境中重新调动起来。临床案例选自有代表性的儿童三个年龄组:学龄前、潜伏期和青春期。这些案例并非旨在展示自我病理学在各个发育阶段的“典型”表现。相反,它们旨在表明自我在其心理(自体客体)环境中发展的理论为儿童治疗师提供了一种理论工具,有助于理解那些在深度心理学层面而非描述层面上,既不能轻易归类为神经症也不能归类为精神病性状况的心理状况。由于父母共情是执行父母自体客体功能的必要条件,这些功能的重新调动将取决于父母对现在出现症状的孩子产生共情的能力。这可能需要对父母一方或双方进行治疗,因为这种能力无法“嫁接到”父母的个性上:这些能力必须成为他们自身核心自我的表达。父母自体客体功能是积极功能,必须与认同过程区分开来……