Lange J D, Wincze J P, Zwick W, Feldman S, Hughes K
Arch Sex Behav. 1981 Oct;10(5):443-64. doi: 10.1007/BF01541436.
Clinical programs for the treatment of impotence generally have been successful but without experimental verification of their individual components or factors associated with the development of impotence. Twenty-four normal males participated in an investigation comparing factors believed to inhibit or facilitate penile tumescence. The effects of demand for performance, self-monitoring of erection, and increased SNS activity, were evaluated. Subjects were exposed to sexual stimuli under these conditions and measurements of penile responses were taken. Results indicated that there were no differential effects on penile responses between demand and no-demand or between self-monitoring and no self-monitoring. Increased SNS activity appeared to facilitate loss of erection, but only after, and not during, the sexual stimulus. The clinical and theoretical implications of these findings are discussed, and suggestions are made for future research.
治疗阳痿的临床方案总体上是成功的,但缺乏对其各个组成部分或与阳痿发生相关因素的实验验证。24名正常男性参与了一项调查,比较了被认为抑制或促进阴茎勃起的因素。评估了表现要求、勃起自我监测和交感神经系统(SNS)活动增加的影响。在这些条件下,让受试者暴露于性刺激下,并测量阴茎反应。结果表明,在有要求和无要求之间或自我监测和无自我监测之间,对阴茎反应没有差异影响。交感神经系统活动增加似乎促进了勃起的丧失,但仅在性刺激之后,而非在性刺激期间。讨论了这些发现的临床和理论意义,并对未来研究提出了建议。