Nicoletti P, Carlsen W B
Am J Vet Res. 1981 Sep;42(9):1494-7.
An indirect hemolysis (IHL) test was compared with 4 other serologic procedures in sensitivity and specificity, using bacteriologic findings from cattle in Brucella-infected herds. The test was more sensitive than the complement-fixation and tube agglutination tests, was similar to the Rivanol test, and was slightly inferior to the card test. It was more specific than the Rivanol, card, and tube agglutination tests, but had less specificity than the complement-fixation test. Results of all procedures were affected in varying degrees by the method of vaccination and time period of sample collections after vaccination. Twenty vaccinated Brucella-free adult cattle were also studied, using the IHL and other tests. Only a few cattle that were previously vaccinated had reactions to the IHL test.
利用布鲁氏菌感染牛群中牛的细菌学检测结果,对间接溶血(IHL)试验与其他4种血清学检测方法的敏感性和特异性进行了比较。该试验比补体结合试验和试管凝集试验更敏感,与利凡诺试验相似,略逊于平板试验。它比利凡诺试验、平板试验和试管凝集试验更具特异性,但比补体结合试验的特异性低。所有检测方法的结果都不同程度地受到疫苗接种方法和接种后样本采集时间段的影响。还使用IHL试验和其他检测方法对20头接种过疫苗的无布鲁氏菌成年牛进行了研究。之前接种过疫苗的牛中只有少数对IHL试验有反应。