Suppr超能文献

标准心电图与24小时动态心电图监测在室性心律失常检测中的比较。

Standard ECG versus 24-hour Holter monitoring in the detection of ventricular arrhythmias.

作者信息

Møller M

出版信息

Clin Cardiol. 1981 Nov-Dec;4(6):322-4. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960040603.

Abstract

A total of 386 corresponding registrations of standard ECG and 24-h Holter monitoring were compared in order to elucidate the information obtainable from a 60-s standard ECG with regard to ventricular arrhythmias. Ventricular ectopic beats (VEB) were present on 17% of the standard ECG against 90% of the monitorings (p less than 0.001). The corresponding figures for complicated VEB (multiform, repetitive, R on T) were 2% and 41%, respectively (p less than 0.001). The presence of VEB on the standard ECG was associated with a significantly increased incidence of all types of ventricular arrhythmias during Holter monitoring performed within the same day. The number of VEBs on the standard ECG did not predict the number during monitoring, but to some extent did predict the occurrence of complicated types. In 52 patients free from VEB on four consecutive standard ECGs, Holter monitoring showed complicated ectopic activity in 32 (62%). Thus standard ECG is an insensitive method for the detection of ventricular arrhythmias.

摘要

为了阐明从60秒标准心电图中获取的关于室性心律失常的信息,对386份标准心电图与24小时动态心电图监测的相应记录进行了比较。17%的标准心电图存在室性早搏(VEB),而动态心电图监测中这一比例为90%(p<0.001)。复杂性室性早搏(多形性、重复性、R波落在T波上)的相应比例分别为2%和41%(p<0.001)。标准心电图上存在室性早搏与同一天进行动态心电图监测期间所有类型室性心律失常的发生率显著增加相关。标准心电图上室性早搏的数量不能预测监测期间的数量,但在一定程度上可以预测复杂性类型的发生。在连续四份标准心电图均无室性早搏的52例患者中,动态心电图监测显示32例(62%)存在复杂性异位活动。因此,标准心电图是检测室性心律失常的一种不敏感方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验