Applegate W B, Spector M H
J Community Health. 1981 Winter;7(2):138-51. doi: 10.1007/BF01323232.
The efficacy of Hemoccult screening for colorectal carcinoma is analyzed utilizing five criteria which a screening test should fulfil before it is used for mass screening. The Hemoccult screening protocol has serious weaknesses. It is at best 83% sensitive for cancer and much less sensitive for polyps. An asymptomatic person with one or more positive Hemoccult slides only has a 12% chance of having cancer. In addition, patient acceptance of mass Hemoccult screening is questionable. There is currently little information on potential survival benefits, and Hemoccult screening is expensive with one quarter of all costs incurred in the diagnostic evaluation of false positives. There is insufficient evidence to recommend Hemoccult colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic persons as a cost-effective practice.
利用筛查试验在用于大规模筛查之前应满足的五项标准,分析了隐血筛查对结直肠癌的疗效。隐血筛查方案存在严重缺陷。它对癌症的敏感性最高为83%,对息肉的敏感性则低得多。一个隐血检测结果为一个或多个阳性的无症状者患癌几率仅为12%。此外,患者对大规模隐血筛查的接受度也存在疑问。目前关于潜在生存益处的信息很少,而且隐血筛查成本高昂,四分之一的费用花在了对假阳性结果的诊断评估上。没有足够的证据推荐对无症状者进行隐血结直肠癌筛查作为一种具有成本效益的做法。