Joseph A M, Crowson T W, Rich E C
Department of Medicine, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN.
J Gen Intern Med. 1988 Mar-Apr;3(2):132-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02596117.
Initial reports on HemoQuant, a new quantitative test for occult gastrointestinal bleeding, suggest it is more sensitive than Hemoccult. Increased detection of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding and dietary hemoglobin may reduce HemoQuant's specificity in the screening setting. The authors performed a cost effectiveness analysis comparing Hemoccult and HemoQuant for colorectal cancer screening using assumptions based on probabilities and costs in the current literature, varying the specificity of HemoQuant. The analysis showed the marginal cost effectiveness of Hemoccult versus no test to be $43,000, and HemoQuant versus Hemoccult to be $296,000 if HemoQuant specificity is 0.95. The marginal cost effectiveness ratio increased to $601,000 if three HemoQuant tests were used. Survival benefit was small and highly dependent on Hemoccult sensitivity and mortality from colonoscopy if HemoQuant specificity was less than 0.9. The authors conclude that unless the high sensitivity reported for HemoQuant is accompanied by a specificity comparable to that of Hemoccult, HemoQuant may not be an acceptable alternative for colorectal cancer screening.
关于一种新型潜血定量检测方法——血液潜血定量检测法(HemoQuant)的初步报告表明,它比潜血检测法(Hemoccult)更为灵敏。对上消化道出血和饮食中血红蛋白检测的增加,可能会降低HemoQuant在筛查中的特异性。作者进行了一项成本效益分析,基于当前文献中的概率和成本假设,比较了Hemoccult和HemoQuant用于结直肠癌筛查的情况,并改变了HemoQuant的特异性。分析表明,如果HemoQuant的特异性为0.95,Hemoccult相对于不进行检测的边际成本效益为43,000美元,而HemoQuant相对于Hemoccult的边际成本效益为296,000美元。如果使用三次HemoQuant检测,边际成本效益比将增至601,000美元。如果HemoQuant的特异性小于0.9,生存获益很小且高度依赖于Hemoccult的敏感性和结肠镜检查导致的死亡率。作者得出结论,除非HemoQuant所报告的高敏感性伴随着与Hemoccult相当的特异性,否则HemoQuant可能不是结直肠癌筛查的可接受替代方法。