Schmidt M G
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1981;14(3):157-66. doi: 10.2190/jkbk-c1gb-buvl-dhvh.
Goffman's model of institutional totality was examined within a social-exchange framework in the boarding and nursing units of two homes for the aged. The power-dependence relationships appeared to be determined by the residents' social resources -- all the assets that enabled them to reward a favor, extort a concession, or do without -- and by the conditions of patienthood that limited their use. Boarders were equally responsive to peer and staff expectations while patients, lacking a cohesive peer group, were more confirming to the demands of staff members, who controlled most of the system's rewards in the nursing units. Efforts to humanize these late-life settings seem unlikely to succeed unless they take into account staff's ability to structure the conditions of negotiation as a base of its power.
在两家养老院的寄宿和护理单元中,戈夫曼的制度整体模型在社会交换框架内得到了检验。权力依赖关系似乎由居民的社会资源决定——所有使他们能够回报恩情、强求让步或无需回报的资产——以及由限制其使用的患者身份条件所决定。寄宿者对同伴和工作人员的期望同样敏感,而患者由于缺乏凝聚力的同伴群体,更倾向于服从工作人员的要求,工作人员在护理单元中控制着系统的大部分奖励。除非考虑到工作人员构建谈判条件作为其权力基础的能力,否则使这些晚年生活环境人性化的努力似乎不太可能成功。