Suppr超能文献

英语辅音量表的检索。

The retrieval of scaled English consonants.

作者信息

Black J W, Wickens D D, Jancosek E

出版信息

J Psycholinguist Res. 1981 Nov;10(6):537-53. doi: 10.1007/BF01067292.

Abstract

Two scales of the perceptual differences among English consonants had been constructed earlier, one from pairs of aural syllables and one from pairs of viewed one-syllable English words. In both instances the pairs of stimuli differed only in the initial consonants. In the present work 276 pairs of syllables were assembled in sets of six. A set was viewed sequentially for 1.5 sec/slide. Then 25 subjects who worked in groups of 4-6 attempted to write one randomly chosen omitted member of each pair on an answer form; another 25 subjects were asked to supply the opposite syllables of each pair. This task was termed "primary memory." Fifty additional subjects repeated the tasks but spent 10 sec counting backward by 3s before trying to recall and write the missing syllables, thus setting up a task of secondary memory. Response forms were scored for right, wrong, and omitted responses. All responses were then compared with each of the scales referred to above, and the mean value for each group of 50 subjects (25 who used the answer form in the ab order + 25 who used the ba order) was computed. The difference between the scores for the two tasks was statistically significant, as was the difference between the scores yielded by the two scales. The "visual" scale appeared to fit the data better than the "aural" scale. The procedures employed and the assumptions that were made yielded results that would not justify an opinion that an error in recall is typically "almost right." However, the data did reflect partial forgetting.

摘要

早期构建了两种关于英语辅音感知差异的量表,一种基于成对的听觉音节,另一种基于成对的视觉单音节英语单词。在这两种情况下,刺激对仅在初始辅音上有所不同。在本研究中,将276对音节分成每组六个的集合。每组以每张幻灯片1.5秒的速度依次呈现。然后,25名以4至6人一组工作的受试者试图在答题纸上写出每对中随机选择的一个遗漏成员;另外25名受试者被要求提供每对音节的相反音节。这项任务被称为“初级记忆”。另外50名受试者重复这些任务,但在试图回忆并写出缺失音节之前,先花10秒从3开始倒数,从而设置了一个次级记忆任务。对答题纸的回答进行正确、错误和遗漏回答的评分。然后将所有回答与上述每种量表进行比较,并计算每组50名受试者(25名按ab顺序使用答题纸的受试者+25名按ba顺序使用答题纸的受试者)的平均值。两项任务得分之间的差异具有统计学意义,两种量表得出的得分之间的差异也具有统计学意义。“视觉”量表似乎比“听觉”量表更符合数据。所采用的程序和所做的假设产生的结果并不足以证明一种观点,即回忆中的错误通常“几乎正确”。然而,数据确实反映了部分遗忘。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验