• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为视力受损儿童的父母提供遗传咨询

[Genetic counseling for parents of children with impaired vision].

作者信息

François J

出版信息

Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1981 Aug;179(2):71-7.

PMID:7347785
Abstract

What is the empirical risk of children being born with a disease or malformation? In healthy families, the parents being normal, the probability is 2 to 4%; when the parents are first cousins, although healthy, it is 5%. Of course, the risk if greater in affected families. When the mother or father is affected and there is no consanguinity, the risk if 20%, but when the parents are first cousins, it is 32.5%. When both parents are affected it is 100%. When the parents are normal but one child is affected, the risk for the other children is 25%. When the mother or father is affected and there is already one child affected, the risk for the other children is 50%. When a grandparent is affected, the risk for the grandchildren is 10%. When an aunt or an uncle is affected, the risk for the nephews and nieces is 7%. With regard to genetic counseling, the parents must understand that no physician can guarantee that a child will be normal. They must also understand that the mendelian risks are the same for each pregnancy. Finally, they must know that for each child there is a 2 to 4% risk of a major congenital anomaly. From the human and psychological point of view, the physician must convince the parents that they are not responsible and that both the husband and the wife may carry pathologic genes, as every individual carries 2 to 10 pathologically recessive genes. Finally, it is not the geneticist's responsibility to impose a decision. Only the parents can decide whether they want more children or not.

摘要

孩子出生时患有疾病或畸形的经验性风险是多少?在健康家庭中,父母正常,其概率为2%至4%;当父母是近亲时,尽管他们健康,但概率为5%。当然,在患病家庭中风险更高。当母亲或父亲患病且无血缘关系时,风险为20%,但当父母是近亲时,风险为32.5%。当父母双方都患病时,风险为100%。当父母正常但一个孩子患病时,其他孩子的风险为25%。当母亲或父亲患病且已有一个孩子患病时,其他孩子的风险为50%。当祖父母患病时,孙辈的风险为10%。当姑姑或叔叔患病时,侄子侄女的风险为7%。关于遗传咨询,父母必须明白,没有医生能保证孩子会正常。他们还必须明白,孟德尔风险对每次怀孕都是相同的。最后,他们必须知道,每个孩子都有2%至4%的风险患重大先天性异常。从人文和心理角度来看,医生必须让父母相信他们没有责任,而且丈夫和妻子都可能携带病理基因,因为每个人都携带2至10个病理性隐性基因。最后,做出决定不是遗传学家的责任。只有父母才能决定他们是否想要更多孩子。

相似文献

1
[Genetic counseling for parents of children with impaired vision].为视力受损儿童的父母提供遗传咨询
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1981 Aug;179(2):71-7.
2
[Genetic counseling of parents of children with eye diseases].[对患有眼部疾病儿童的父母进行遗传咨询]
J Genet Hum. 1980 Dec;28(4):105-22.
3
Families at high and low risk for depression: a 3-generation study.抑郁症高风险和低风险家庭:一项三代人的研究。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Jan;62(1):29-36. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.1.29.
4
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
5
A review of genetic mutation in familial Hirschsprung's disease in South Africa: towards genetic counseling.南非家族性先天性巨结肠症基因突变综述:迈向遗传咨询
J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Feb;43(2):325-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.10.021.
6
[Genetic counseling and poor-sighted children].[遗传咨询与视力不佳儿童]
Annee Ther Clin Ophtalmol. 1980;31:43-61.
7
Recurrence risks for retinoblastoma: a model for autosomal dominant disorders with complex inheritance.视网膜母细胞瘤的复发风险:一种具有复杂遗传的常染色体显性疾病模型。
J Pediatr Ophthalmol. 1976 Mar;13(2):89-98.
8
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明更新:癌症易感性基因检测
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2397-406. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.189. Epub 2003 Apr 11.
9
Familial truncus arteriosus: a possible autosomal-recessive trait.家族性动脉干:一种可能的常染色体隐性性状。
Pediatr Cardiol. 2003 Jan-Feb;24(1):64-6. doi: 10.1007/s00246-001-0099-7.
10
[Useful data in genetic counseling].
Ann Ocul (Paris). 1972 Nov;205(11):1173-80.