• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神状态检查中的认知任务。 (注:原英文文本中“taska”应是“tasks”的拼写错误)

Cognitive taska in the mental status examination.

作者信息

Taylor M A, Abrams R, Faber R, Almy G

出版信息

J Nerv Ment Dis. 1980 Mar;168(3):167-70. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198003000-00007.

DOI:10.1097/00005053-198003000-00007
PMID:7354319
Abstract

We evaluated the reliability of 20 cognitive tasks as part of a clinical mental status examination. Twenty-five adult psychiatric inpatients were selected at random and inter viewed before three board-certified psychiatrists who, without any knowledge of each other's ratings, completed a form determining the presence or absence of abnormal responses. We found 19 of the 20 items to yield R values of greater than .50, with 14 of these having R values of .80 or better. All correlations were significant at the less than .01 level. We suggest that these cognitive tasks with demonstrated reliability be included in the standard mental status examination. As a group, the tasks are easily and rapidly administered and should provide more accurate clinical screening of patients suspected of cortical dysfunction. These tasks will enable clinicians to make more precise and cost-effective referrals for elaborate, time-consuming, and expensive neuropsychological testing.

摘要

作为临床精神状态检查的一部分,我们评估了20项认知任务的可靠性。随机挑选了25名成年精神科住院患者,并在三位获得委员会认证的精神科医生面前接受访谈,这三位医生在互不了解对方评分的情况下,填写了一份表格来确定是否存在异常反应。我们发现20项中的19项产生的R值大于0.50,其中14项的R值为0.80或更高。所有相关性在小于0.01的水平上具有显著性。我们建议将这些已证明具有可靠性的认知任务纳入标准精神状态检查。总体而言,这些任务易于快速实施,并且应该能够为疑似皮质功能障碍的患者提供更准确的临床筛查。这些任务将使临床医生能够做出更精确且具成本效益的转诊,以便进行详尽、耗时且昂贵的神经心理学测试。

相似文献

1
Cognitive taska in the mental status examination.精神状态检查中的认知任务。 (注:原英文文本中“taska”应是“tasks”的拼写错误)
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1980 Mar;168(3):167-70. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198003000-00007.
2
The Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination: comparison with the Cognitive Capacity Screening Examination and the Mini-Mental State Examination in a neurosurgical population.神经行为认知状态检查:与神经外科人群中的认知能力筛查检查及简易精神状态检查的比较
Ann Intern Med. 1987 Oct;107(4):486-91. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-107-4-486.
3
Neuropsychometric correlates of the Mini-Mental State Examination: preliminary data.简易精神状态检查表的神经心理测量学关联:初步数据
Percept Mot Skills. 1987 Aug;65(1):64-6. doi: 10.2466/pms.1987.65.1.64.
4
Detection of cognitive deficits by a brief mental status examination: the Cognitive Capacity Screening Examination, a reappraisal and a review.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1979 Sep;1(3):247-55. doi: 10.1016/0163-8343(79)90026-4.
5
The Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination: a brief but quantitative approach to cognitive assessment.神经行为认知状态检查:一种简短但定量的认知评估方法。
Ann Intern Med. 1987 Oct;107(4):481-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-107-4-481.
6
Implications of self-reported cognitive and motor dysfunction in HIV-positive patients.
Am J Psychiatry. 1991 May;148(5):641-3. doi: 10.1176/ajp.148.5.641.
7
Brief assessment of cognitive impairment in patients with stroke.中风患者认知障碍的简要评估
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989 Feb;70(2):114-7.
8
A survey of the form of the mental status examination administered by emergency physicians.一项关于急诊医生所进行的精神状态检查形式的调查。
Ann Emerg Med. 1986 Aug;15(8):916-22. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(86)80675-8.
9
The validity of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R) in acute stroke.《Addenbrooke's 认知测验修订版(ACE-R)在急性脑卒中中的有效性》。
Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(3):189-95. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.591884.
10
Recognition of cognitive impairment in primary care outpatients.
South Med J. 1983 Oct;76(10):1264-5, 1270. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198310000-00017.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive impairment patterns in schizophrenia and affective disorder.精神分裂症和情感障碍中的认知障碍模式。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987 Jul;50(7):895-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.50.7.895.