Poffé R, de Burggrave A, Houtmeyers J, Verachtert H
Zentralbl Bakteriol B. 1978 Nov;167(4):337-46.
Two peroxy acids, peracetic acid (PAA) and peroxy-monosulfuric acid or caro acid (CA) were tested as alternative bactericidal agents for the disinfection of effluents from municipal sewage treatment plants and their action was compared with chlorine. PAA added in a concentration of 2000 and 400 ppm, commonly used in medicin, killed in a few minutes 99.9% or more of most bacteria of the effluents (Fig. 1, A, B, C, D, E) excepted staphylococci and micrococci (Fig 1, F) and endospores (Fig. 1, G). These effects were comparable with those obtained with 5 ppm chlorine. Although these results indicate a very good killing effect, such concentrations of PAA are not applicable in practice, as they lowered the pH and increased the BOD of the effluent. When PAA was added in smaller amounts (10 and 5 ppm) no change of the pH and only a negligible increase of the BOD (Table 1) occured. These concentrations with a contact time of 15 min, gave a very good reduction of most bacterial groups, varying between 96% (total count, Fig. 1 A) and 100% (group-D streptococci, Fig. 1 E). With 1 ppm PAA the bactericidal action was slower, but after 30 minutes contact time the effects were similar to these of 5 ppm. It was also demonstrated that the effect of PAA was not affected by the number of bacteria in the effluent before treatment (Table 2), but well by the BOD. The addition of the inorganic CA in high concentrations had only a disadvantageous effect on the pH of the effluent, but no effect was noted when it was added in concentrations of 10 ppm. In this concentration, contact times of 120 min were necessary to kill about 90% of most bacteria (Fig. 2), showing that CA was only a weak disinfectant with slow action. It may be concluded that 5 ppm PAA could be a good alternative disinfectant for secondary effluents with a high degree of purification.
测试了两种过氧酸,即过氧乙酸(PAA)和过一硫酸或过氧硫酸(CA)作为城市污水处理厂废水消毒的替代杀菌剂,并将它们的作用与氯进行了比较。以2000 ppm和400 ppm的浓度添加PAA(这是医学中常用的浓度),几分钟内就能杀死废水中99.9%或更多的大多数细菌(图1,A、B、C、D、E),葡萄球菌和微球菌除外(图1,F),芽孢也除外(图1,G)。这些效果与5 ppm氯所获得的效果相当。尽管这些结果表明杀菌效果非常好,但如此高浓度的PAA在实际中并不适用,因为它们会降低废水的pH值并增加其生化需氧量。当添加较少量的PAA(10 ppm和5 ppm)时,pH值没有变化,生化需氧量仅略有增加(表1)。这些浓度在接触15分钟时,能很好地减少大多数细菌菌群,减少幅度在96%(总菌数,图1 A)到100%(D组链球菌,图1 E)之间。使用1 ppm的PAA时,杀菌作用较慢,但接触30分钟后的效果与5 ppm的相似。还证明了PAA的效果不受处理前废水中细菌数量的影响(表2),但受生化需氧量的影响很大。高浓度添加无机CA仅对废水的pH值有不利影响,但以10 ppm的浓度添加时未观察到影响。在此浓度下,需要120分钟的接触时间才能杀死约90%的大多数细菌(图2),这表明CA只是一种作用缓慢的弱消毒剂。可以得出结论,5 ppm的PAA可能是二级高纯度废水的一种良好替代消毒剂。