Cohen S N, Syndulko K, Tourtellotte W W, Potvin A R
Arch Neurol. 1980 Feb;37(2):80-3. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1980.00500510038005.
Patients with known or suspected multiple sclerosis (MS) were tested for abnormalities in visual evoked potentials. We compared the critical frequency of photic driving (CFPD) with pattern reversal visual evoked potentials (PVER). We found the CFPD to be somewhat more sensitive than PVER for detecting abnormalities in the visual pathways of patients with MS. When used together, the two were complementary, each fining abnormalities that the other missed. When evaluating patients with MS with evoked potentials, both PVER and CFPD should be tested.
对已知或疑似患有多发性硬化症（MS）的患者进行视觉诱发电位异常检测。我们将闪光刺激临界频率（CFPD）与图形翻转视觉诱发电位（PVER）进行了比较。我们发现，在检测MS患者视觉通路异常方面，CFPD比PVER稍敏感一些。两者联合使用时具有互补性，各自能发现对方遗漏的异常情况。在对MS患者进行诱发电位评估时，应同时检测PVER和CFPD。
