• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多发性骨髓瘤的预处理肿瘤肿块、细胞动力学及预后

Pretreatment tumor mass, cell kinetics, and prognosis in multiple myeloma.

作者信息

Durie B G, Salmon S E, Moon T E

出版信息

Blood. 1980 Mar;55(3):364-72.

PMID:7357075
Abstract

One-hundred fifty patients with multiple (plasma cell) myeloma had pretreatment tumor mass staging, and 79 also had measurement of the pretreatment labeling index (LI%). There were clear differences in survival by pretreatment stage of disease. The pretreatment LI% of bone marrow plasma cells was an independent prognostic factor both in single factor and multivariate regression analyses, including myeloma stage (p less than 0.02). Other important prognostic factors (multivariate) included performance status, serum creatinine, presence of Bence Jones protein, age, and kappa/lambda subtype. A LI% of less than 1% was associated with long survival in each patient group. Patients with benign gammopathy had excellent survival and very low labeling indices. A pretreatment LI% of greater than 3% in high cell mass patients with a high total number of DNA synthesizing cells (S) conferred a very poor prognosis (p = 0.002). This subgroup of patients with high S values also had a high incidence of central nervous system relapse (27%), Bence Jones proteinuria, and elevated serum uric acid levels. We conclude that the pretreatment labeling index provides helpful prognostic information in addition to tumor mass staging.

摘要

150例多发性(浆细胞)骨髓瘤患者进行了治疗前肿瘤肿块分期,79例还测定了治疗前标记指数(LI%)。疾病治疗前阶段的生存率存在明显差异。骨髓浆细胞的治疗前LI%在单因素和多因素回归分析中都是独立的预后因素,包括骨髓瘤分期(p<0.02)。其他重要的预后因素(多因素)包括体能状态、血清肌酐、本周氏蛋白的存在、年龄和κ/λ亚型。LI%低于1%与每个患者组的长期生存相关。良性丙种球蛋白病患者生存率极佳,标记指数极低。在DNA合成细胞总数(S)高的高细胞肿块患者中,治疗前LI%大于3%预后极差(p = 0.002)。这个S值高的患者亚组中枢神经系统复发率也很高(27%),伴有本周氏蛋白尿和血清尿酸水平升高。我们得出结论,治疗前标记指数除了提供肿瘤肿块分期信息外,还能提供有用的预后信息。

相似文献

1
Pretreatment tumor mass, cell kinetics, and prognosis in multiple myeloma.多发性骨髓瘤的预处理肿瘤肿块、细胞动力学及预后
Blood. 1980 Mar;55(3):364-72.
2
A new improved clinical staging system for multiple myeloma based on analysis of 123 treated patients.
Blood. 1980 Jun;55(6):1011-9.
3
[Prognostic factors in IgG and micromolecular multiple myeloma. Retrospective analysis of 50 consecutive cases].
Minerva Med. 1987 May 15;78(9):603-8.
4
A new staging system for multiple myeloma based on the number of S-phase plasma cells.一种基于S期浆细胞数量的多发性骨髓瘤新分期系统。
Blood. 1995 Jan 15;85(2):448-55.
5
Classification and prognostic evaluation in multiple myeloma. A retrospective study of relationship of survivals and responses to chemotherapy to immunological types, 20 single prognostic factors, 15 clinical staging systems, and 6 morphological classifications.多发性骨髓瘤的分类与预后评估。一项关于生存及化疗反应与免疫类型、20个单一预后因素、15种临床分期系统及6种形态学分类之间关系的回顾性研究。
Panminerva Med. 1991 Apr-Jun;33(2):93-110.
6
[The wide variations of the clinical behavior and prognosis in multiple myeloma].[多发性骨髓瘤临床行为和预后的广泛差异]
Rinsho Ketsueki. 1993 Apr;34(4):439-43.
7
Determination of plasma cell secreting potential as an index of maturity of myelomatous cells and a strong prognostic factor.测定浆细胞分泌潜能作为骨髓瘤细胞成熟的指标及一个重要的预后因素。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2002 Aug;43(8):1605-12. doi: 10.1080/1042819021000002938.
8
Prognostic factors in IgD myeloma: a study of 21 cases.
Scand J Haematol. 1984 Nov;33(5):471-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.1984.tb00727.x.
9
Synthesis and metabolism of Bence Jones protein and calculation of tumour burden in patients with Bence Jones myeloma.本-周蛋白的合成与代谢以及本-周蛋白骨髓瘤患者肿瘤负荷的计算
Br J Haematol. 1981 Jan;47(1):7-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1981.tb02757.x.
10
[Prognostic factors in multiple myeloma. Selection using multivariate analysis].
Recenti Prog Med. 1989 Oct;80(10):543-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Chromosomal Aberrations and S-phase Fraction in Patients With Esophageal Cancer.食管癌患者染色体畸变与S期细胞分数的评估
Cureus. 2025 May 15;17(5):e84204. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84204. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Antibody-Drug Conjugates for Multiple Myeloma: Just the Beginning, or the Beginning of the End?用于多发性骨髓瘤的抗体药物偶联物:只是开端,还是终结的开始?
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 Apr 14;16(4):590. doi: 10.3390/ph16040590.
3
Comparative Evaluation of Common Comorbidity Scores and Freiburger Comorbidity Index as Prognostic Variables in a Real Life Multiple Myeloma Population.
常见合并症评分与弗赖堡合并症指数作为现实生活中多发性骨髓瘤人群预后变量的比较评估
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2016 Dec;32(4):424-430. doi: 10.1007/s12288-015-0618-y. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
4
Smoldering multiple myeloma requiring treatment: time for a new definition?冒烟型多发性骨髓瘤需要治疗:是否需要新的定义?
Blood. 2013 Dec 19;122(26):4172-81. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-08-520890. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
5
Spectrum of monoclonal gammapathies in Andhra Pradesh.安得拉邦单克隆丙种球蛋白病的谱系
Indian J Clin Biochem. 2001 Jan;16(1):52-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02867568.
6
Combining fluorescent in situ hybridization data with ISS staging improves risk assessment in myeloma: an International Myeloma Working Group collaborative project.将荧光原位杂交数据与 ISS 分期相结合可改善骨髓瘤的风险评估:国际骨髓瘤工作组协作项目。
Leukemia. 2013 Mar;27(3):711-7. doi: 10.1038/leu.2012.282. Epub 2012 Oct 3.
7
Immunophenotyping in multiple myeloma and related plasma cell disorders.多发性骨髓瘤及相关浆细胞疾病的免疫表型分析。
Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2010 Sep;23(3):433-51. doi: 10.1016/j.beha.2010.09.002.
8
Management of newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma: updated Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART) consensus guidelines.新诊断有症状多发性骨髓瘤的治疗:更新的 Mayo 多发性骨髓瘤分层和风险适应治疗(mSMART)共识指南。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2009 Dec;84(12):1095-110. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2009.0603.
9
Treatment of multiple myeloma in elderly patients. New developments.老年多发性骨髓瘤的治疗。新进展。
Drugs Aging. 1997 Aug;11(2):152-64. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199711020-00007.
10
Plasma cell proliferation in monoclonal gammopathies: measurement using BU-1 antibody in flow cytometry and microscopy: comparison with serum thymidine kinase.单克隆丙种球蛋白病中的浆细胞增殖:流式细胞术和显微镜检查中使用BU-1抗体进行测量:与血清胸苷激酶的比较
J Clin Pathol. 1995 May;48(5):477-81. doi: 10.1136/jcp.48.5.477.