George W D, Sellwood R A, Asbury D, Hartley G
Br Med J. 1980 Jan 19;280(6208):147-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.280.6208.147.
In a feasibility study of mass population screening for breast cancer by clinical examination and mammography the ability of non-medical staff (nurses and radiographers) to act as primary screeners was compared with that of medical staff (surgeons and radiologists). In 240 women with cancer the rate of detection of the disease by the non-medical staff was comparable to that of the medical staff, although the non-medical staff detected more cancers by mammography alone than did the medical staff. The rate of detection by surgeons and particularly nurses was lower in women without symptoms than in those with symptoms, whereas the incidence of detection by radiologists and radiographers was lower in women aged under 50 than in those over 50. The rate of detection by all groups of staff significantly increased with increases in tumour size. The results suggest that non-medical staff can act effectively as primary screeners, but that for the detection of cancer in asymptomatic women, particularly those over 50, mammography is probably more effective than clinical examination.
在一项通过临床检查和乳房X光摄影对大量人群进行乳腺癌筛查的可行性研究中,将非医务人员(护士和放射技师)作为初筛人员的能力与医务人员(外科医生和放射科医生)进行了比较。在240名患有癌症的女性中,非医务人员对该疾病的检出率与医务人员相当,尽管非医务人员仅通过乳房X光摄影检测出的癌症比医务人员更多。外科医生尤其是护士对无症状女性的检出率低于有症状的女性,而放射科医生和放射技师对50岁以下女性的检出率低于50岁以上的女性。所有工作人员的检出率均随肿瘤大小的增加而显著提高。结果表明,非医务人员可以有效地担任初筛人员,但对于无症状女性尤其是50岁以上女性的癌症检测,乳房X光摄影可能比临床检查更有效。