• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

损伤严重程度评估:分诊指数

Assessment of injury severity: the triage index.

作者信息

Champion H R, Sacco W J, Hannan D S, Lepper R L, Atzinger E S, Copes W S, Prall R H

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1980 Apr;8(4):201-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198004000-00001.

DOI:10.1097/00003246-198004000-00001
PMID:7357873
Abstract

Injury severity scales of proven reliability and validity are essential for the appropriate allocation of therapeutic resources, for prediction of outcome, and for evaluation of the quantity and quality of emergency medical care in differing facilities and over time. Quantitation of injury severity in the field is particularly necessary. Existing scales are too imprecise to permit comparisons of management or systems of care. In this paper, the authors present the Triage Index, a measure of injury severity based on five simple variables observed in a design data set of 1084 patients. The Triage Index has been developed with state-of-the-art multivariate statistical techniques, meets the requirements of an interval ranking scale, and has been both validated and assessed for interuser reliability. The Triage Index is proposed as a validated system of early, rapid, noninvasive, accurate patient assessment permitting appropriate matching of trauma victims with available therapeutic resources as a means of reducing mortality and morbidity.

摘要

经证实具有可靠性和有效性的损伤严重程度量表对于合理分配治疗资源、预测预后以及评估不同医疗机构在不同时间的急诊医疗服务的数量和质量至关重要。在现场对损伤严重程度进行量化尤为必要。现有的量表不够精确,无法对治疗管理或护理系统进行比较。在本文中,作者提出了分诊指数,这是一种基于在1084例患者的设计数据集中观察到的五个简单变量的损伤严重程度测量方法。分诊指数是采用最先进的多变量统计技术开发的,符合区间排名量表的要求,并且已经过验证和评估其使用者间的可靠性。分诊指数被提议作为一种经过验证的早期、快速、无创、准确的患者评估系统,通过使创伤受害者与可用治疗资源进行适当匹配,以降低死亡率和发病率。

相似文献

1
Assessment of injury severity: the triage index.损伤严重程度评估:分诊指数
Crit Care Med. 1980 Apr;8(4):201-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198004000-00001.
2
Disaster triage after the Haitian earthquake.海地地震后的灾难分诊。
Injury. 2012 Nov;43(11):1811-5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.07.015. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
3
Guidelines for field triage of injured patients. Recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage.受伤患者现场分诊指南。国家现场分诊专家小组的建议。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2009 Jan 23;58(RR-1):1-35.
4
Trauma systems.创伤系统
Surg Clin North Am. 2007 Feb;87(1):21-35, v-vi. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2006.09.012.
5
Current state of trauma care in China, tools to predict death and ICU admission after arrival to hospital.中国创伤护理的现状、预测入院后死亡及入住重症监护病房的工具。
Injury. 2015 Sep;46(9):1784-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
6
Medical evacuation and triage of combat casualties in Helmand Province, Afghanistan: October 2010-April 2011.2010年10月至2011年4月阿富汗赫尔曼德省战斗伤员的医疗后送与伤员分类
Mil Med. 2012 Nov;177(11):1261-6. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-11-00120.
7
Mass casualty triage after an airplane crash near Amsterdam.阿姆斯特丹附近飞机坠毁后的大批伤员伤检分类
Injury. 2013 Aug;44(8):1061-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.03.038. Epub 2013 May 17.
8
Major incident triage: A consensus based definition of the essential life-saving interventions during the definitive care phase of a major incident.重大事件分诊:重大事件确定性治疗阶段挽救生命的必要干预措施的基于共识的定义。
Injury. 2016 Sep;47(9):1898-902. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.06.022. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
9
[Massive injuries and triage].[严重创伤与分诊]
MMW Munch Med Wochenschr. 1980 Oct 17;122(42):1455-6.
10
Steps in index of injury/illness severity development.
Emerg Med Serv. 1978 Nov-Dec;7(6):103-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic value of capillary refill time in adult patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis.毛细血管再充盈时间对成人患者预后的预测价值:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2023 Dec 2;27(1):473. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04751-9.
2
The prognostic value of an age-adjusted BIG score in adult patients with traumatic brain injury.年龄校正后的BIG评分在成年创伤性脑损伤患者中的预后价值。
Front Neurol. 2023 Nov 2;14:1272994. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1272994. eCollection 2023.
3
Comparison of pre-PICU and per-PICU interventions, clinical features and neurologic outcomes of motor vehicle collision trauma and other mechanisms of trauma in children.
比较儿童机动车事故创伤和其他创伤机制的 PICU 前和 PICU 期间干预措施、临床特征和神经学结局。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Apr;28(4):456-463. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2022.86617.
4
The TRAAGIC score: early predictors of inpatient mortality in adult trauma patients.TRAAGIC 评分:成人创伤患者住院病死率的早期预测指标。
Can J Surg. 2020 Jan 22;63(1):E38-E45. doi: 10.1503/cjs.016318.
5
Clinical Examination for the Prediction of Mortality in the Critically Ill: The Simple Intensive Care Studies-I.危重病患者死亡率预测的临床检查:简单重症监护研究-I。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct;47(10):1301-1309. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003897.
6
Development of a heart rate variability and complexity model in predicting the need for life-saving interventions amongst trauma patients.心率变异性和复杂性模型在预测创伤患者是否需要进行挽救生命干预措施方面的开发。
Burns Trauma. 2019 Apr 18;7:12. doi: 10.1186/s41038-019-0147-2. eCollection 2019.
7
New Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) adjustments for survival prediction.新创伤和损伤严重度评分(TRISS)调整以进行生存预测。
World J Emerg Surg. 2018 Mar 6;13:12. doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0171-8. eCollection 2018.
8
Capillary refill time during fluid resuscitation in patients with sepsis-related hyperlactatemia at the emergency department is related to mortality.急诊科脓毒症相关高乳酸血症患者液体复苏期间的毛细血管再充盈时间与死亡率相关。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 27;12(11):e0188548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188548. eCollection 2017.
9
Clinical examination, critical care ultrasonography and outcomes in the critically ill: cohort profile of the Simple Intensive Care Studies-I.危重症患者的临床检查、重症超声检查与预后:简易重症监护研究-I队列概况
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 27;7(9):e017170. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017170.
10
Clinical examination for diagnosing circulatory shock.临床检查在诊断循环性休克中的应用。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2017 Aug;23(4):293-301. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000420.