Test M A, Stein L I
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1980 Apr;37(4):409-12. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1980.01780170051005.
Much concern has been expressed over the possible burden placed on family and community members by programs that emphasize community treatment of severely disturbed patients. In this study, the social costs of an experimental in-community program were compared with those of a traditional approach using short-term hospitalization plus aftercare. Six objective and one subjective measures of the burden placed on the family members of patients in both groups were obtained. Community burden was assessed through police records of frequency of patient arrests, number of suicidal gestures that required medical attention, and frequency of emergency room use. All measures showed that the total in-community program resulted in no more burden on the family or community than the traditional approach. The large amount of support provided to patients, families, and community members in the experimental approach is emphasized in explaining these results.
人们对那些强调对重症精神障碍患者进行社区治疗的项目可能给家庭和社区成员带来的负担表示了诸多担忧。在本研究中,将一个社区实验项目的社会成本与采用短期住院加后续护理的传统方法的成本进行了比较。获取了两组中患者家庭成员负担的六项客观指标和一项主观指标。通过警方记录的患者被捕频率、需要医疗救治的自杀未遂次数以及急诊室使用频率来评估社区负担。所有指标均显示,与传统方法相比,整个社区项目给家庭或社区带来的负担并未增加。在解释这些结果时,强调了实验方法为患者、家庭和社区成员提供的大量支持。