• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复杂干预与组织间关系:审视积极社区治疗的核心实施要素

Complex Interventions and Interorganisational Relationships: Examining Core Implementation Components of Assertive Community Treatment.

作者信息

Bergmark Magnus, Bejerholm Ulrika, Svensson Bengt, Markström Urban

机构信息

Department of Social Work, Umeå University, Umeå, SE.

Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, SE.

出版信息

Int J Integr Care. 2018 Dec 6;18(4):11. doi: 10.5334/ijic.3547.

DOI:10.5334/ijic.3547
PMID:30532665
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6284138/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is increasing interest in implementing evidence-based integrated models of care in community-based mental health service systems. Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) is seen as an attractive, and at the same time challenging, model to implement in sectored service settings. This study investigates the implementation process of such an initiative.

METHODS

Interviews were conducted with ACT team members, the process leader, steering group members, and collaboration partners. The "Sustainable Implementation Scale" helped to identify critical implementation components, and these were further explored using the qualitative interview data. The "Tool for Measuring Assertive Community Treatment" addressed programme fidelity, and the initiative's sustainability was assessed.

RESULTS

High-fidelity implementation of ACT in a sectored service setting is possible. Prominent components that facilitated implementation were careful preparations, team members' characteristics, and efforts by the process leader and the steering group to improve networking. Implementation was hampered by conflicting goals among the involved authorities and a mismatch between the ACT model's characteristics and existing organisational traditions and regulations.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Reducing the uncertainty caused by conflicting goals is an important step in improving the implementation of ACT. In order to facilitate implementation, the goals, regulations, and availability of resources should be aligned horizontally and vertically through the involved organisations.

摘要

引言

在社区心理健康服务系统中实施基于证据的综合护理模式的兴趣日益浓厚。积极社区治疗(ACT)被视为一种在部门服务环境中实施具有吸引力但同时也具有挑战性的模式。本研究调查了这一举措的实施过程。

方法

对ACT团队成员、流程负责人、指导小组成员和合作伙伴进行了访谈。“可持续实施量表”有助于确定关键的实施组成部分,并利用定性访谈数据对这些部分进行进一步探讨。“积极社区治疗测量工具”涉及项目保真度,并评估了该举措的可持续性。

结果

在部门服务环境中高保真实施ACT是可能的。促进实施的突出组成部分包括精心准备、团队成员的特点以及流程负责人和指导小组为改善网络所做的努力。实施受到相关当局之间目标冲突以及ACT模式特点与现有组织传统和规定不匹配的阻碍。

讨论与结论

减少目标冲突导致的不确定性是改善ACT实施的重要一步。为了促进实施,应通过相关组织在横向和纵向层面使目标、规定和资源可用性保持一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60dd/6284138/f43294802a71/ijic-18-4-3547-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60dd/6284138/f43294802a71/ijic-18-4-3547-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60dd/6284138/f43294802a71/ijic-18-4-3547-g1.jpg

相似文献

1
Complex Interventions and Interorganisational Relationships: Examining Core Implementation Components of Assertive Community Treatment.复杂干预与组织间关系:审视积极社区治疗的核心实施要素
Int J Integr Care. 2018 Dec 6;18(4):11. doi: 10.5334/ijic.3547.
2
Model fidelity and team members' experiences of assertive community treatment in Norway: a sequential mixed-methods study.挪威积极社区治疗的模型保真度与团队成员的经验:一项序列混合方法研究
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2019 Oct 16;13:65. doi: 10.1186/s13033-019-0321-8. eCollection 2019.
3
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
4
Statewide implementation of high-fidelity recovery-oriented ACT: A case study.全州范围内实施高保真的以康复为导向的积极社区治疗:一项案例研究。
Implement Res Pract. 2021 Feb 26;2:2633489521994938. doi: 10.1177/2633489521994938. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
5
Implementing illness management and recovery within assertive community treatment teams: A qualitative study.在专责社区治疗队伍中推行疾病管理和康复计划:一项定性研究。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2020 Jun;43(2):121-131. doi: 10.1037/prj0000387. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
6
Innovation and Its Discontents: Pathways and Barriers in the Diffusion of Assertive Community Treatment.创新及其不满:积极社区治疗传播的途径与障碍
Milbank Q. 2019 Dec;97(4):1151-1199. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12429. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
7
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
10
Program fidelity and beyond: multiple strategies and criteria for ensuring quality of assertive community treatment.项目保真度及其他:确保强化社区治疗质量的多种策略和标准。
Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Aug;63(8):743-50. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100015.

引用本文的文献

1
Stories of taking part in Everyday Life Rehabilitation - A narrative inquiry of residents with serious mental illness and their recovery pathway.参与日常生活康复的故事——对重度精神疾病患者及其康复途径的叙事探究。
AIMS Public Health. 2024 Dec 13;11(4):1198-1222. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024062. eCollection 2024.
2
Barriers and facilitators to implement Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) in Japan: a qualitative study protocol using Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).在日本实施积极社区治疗(ACT)的障碍和促进因素:使用实施研究整合框架(CFIR)的定性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 7;14(11):e085160. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085160.
3

本文引用的文献

1
What influences a sustainable implementation of evidence-based interventions in community mental health services? Development and pilot testing of a tool for mapping core components.哪些因素会影响社区心理健康服务中基于证据的干预措施的可持续实施?用于绘制核心要素的工具的开发和试点测试。
J Ment Health. 2018 Oct;27(5):395-401. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2017.1417544. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
2
Community Care for People with Complex Care Needs: Bridging the Gap between Health and Social Care.为有复杂护理需求者提供的社区护理:弥合健康与社会护理之间的差距。
Int J Integr Care. 2017 Jul 21;17(4):2. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2944.
3
Developing a comprehensive definition of sustainability.
From Model to Everyday Practice: A Qualitative Observational Study of Daily Fact Team Board Meetings.
从模型到日常实践:每日事实团队董事会会议的定性观察研究
Int J Integr Care. 2023 Oct 10;23(4):1. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7555. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
4
Healthcare workers' perceptions and experiences of primary healthcare integration: a scoping review of qualitative evidence.医护人员对初级医疗一体化的认知和体验:定性证据的范围综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 19;7(7):CD013603. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013603.pub3.
5
Healthcare workers' perceptions and experiences of primary healthcare integration: a scoping review of qualitative evidence.卫生保健工作者对初级卫生保健整合的看法和经验:定性证据的范围综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 11;7(7):CD013603. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013603.pub2.
6
A systematic review of measures of implementation players and processes: Summarizing the dearth of psychometric evidence.对实施参与者和过程的测量方法的系统评价:总结心理测量证据的匮乏情况。
Implement Res Pract. 2021 Apr 6;2:26334895211002474. doi: 10.1177/26334895211002474. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
7
Implementation of the Recovery Guide in inpatient mental health services in Sweden-A process evaluation study.《瑞典住院精神卫生服务中康复指南的实施:一项过程评估研究》。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1405-1417. doi: 10.1111/hex.13480. Epub 2022 Mar 27.
8
Defining Optimal Post-prison Care for Those With Psychosis: A Delphi Study.为精神病患者确定最佳出狱后护理方案:一项德尔菲研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 22;12:760904. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.760904. eCollection 2021.
9
Flexible assertive community treatment teams can change complex and fragmented service systems: experiences of service providers.灵活的积极社区治疗团队能够改变复杂且分散的服务体系:服务提供者的经验。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2021 Apr 23;15(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13033-021-00463-1.
10
An integrated mental health and vocational intervention: A longitudinal study on mental health changes among young adults.一项综合性心理健康和职业干预措施:一项关于年轻人心理健康变化的纵向研究。
Nurs Open. 2020 Jul 9;7(6):1755-1765. doi: 10.1002/nop2.560. eCollection 2020 Nov.
制定可持续性的全面定义。
Implement Sci. 2017 Sep 2;12(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0637-1.
4
Intensive case management for severe mental illness.严重精神疾病的强化个案管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 6;1(1):CD007906. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007906.pub3.
5
Mental health professional experiences of the flexible assertive community treatment model: a grounded theory study.灵活的积极社区治疗模式下心理健康专业人员的经历:一项扎根理论研究
J Ment Health. 2016 Aug;25(4):379-384. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2016.1207236. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
6
Sustainability of evidence-based healthcare: research agenda, methodological advances, and infrastructure support.循证医疗的可持续性:研究议程、方法学进展及基础设施支持。
Implement Sci. 2015 Jun 11;10:88. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0274-5.
7
Outcomes of FLEXIBLE Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) Implementation: A Prospective Real Life Study.灵活主动社区治疗(FACT)实施的结果:一项前瞻性现实生活研究。
Community Ment Health J. 2016 Nov;52(8):898-907. doi: 10.1007/s10597-015-9831-2. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
8
Staying the course? Challenges in implementing evidence-based programs in community mental health services.坚持到底?社区心理健康服务中实施循证项目面临的挑战。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Oct 16;11(10):10752-69. doi: 10.3390/ijerph111010752.
9
The quality implementation framework: a synthesis of critical steps in the implementation process.质量实施框架:实施过程中关键步骤的综合。
Am J Community Psychol. 2012 Dec;50(3-4):462-80. doi: 10.1007/s10464-012-9522-x.
10
The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research.新计划和创新的可持续性:对实证文献的回顾和对未来研究的建议。
Implement Sci. 2012 Mar 14;7:17. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-17.