Suppr超能文献

质疑当前性别认同的定义:贝姆性别角色量表对变性者的影响。

Questioning current definitions of gender identity: implications of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory for transsexuals.

作者信息

Fleming M Z, Jenkins S R, Bugarin C

出版信息

Arch Sex Behav. 1980 Feb;9(1):13-26. doi: 10.1007/BF01541398.

Abstract

To examine the relationship between sex role and gender identity, the Bem Sex-Role Inventory (BSRI) was given to 72 self-defined transsexuals [55 male-to-female (M-F), 17 female-to-male (F-M)]. The F-Ms scored primarily masculine sex typed (six) or androgynous (six). The modal M-F scored faminine sex typed (33). The distribution of F-Ms across the four BSRI categories did not differ significantly from Bem's normative college student male distribution [chi2(3) = 2.30, p greater than 0.50] but was marginally different from that of Bem's females [chi2(3) = 6.45, p less than 0.10]. The distribution of M-Fs was significantly different from that of both college females [chi2(3) = 19.71, p less than 0.001] and males [chi2 (3) = 88.72, p less than 0.0001], because of the very high proportion of feminine sex-typed M-Fs. Psychometric data on the BSRI are presented. The score patterns of the transsexuals are compared to those from the clinical literature, and implications of the data for the relationship between gender identity and sex role are discussed.

摘要

为了研究性别角色与性别认同之间的关系,我们对72名自我认定的变性者[55名男变女(M-F),17名女变男(F-M)]进行了贝姆性别角色量表(BSRI)测试。女变男者的得分主要为男性化性别类型(6人)或两性化(6人)。典型的男变女者得分是女性化性别类型(33人)。女变男者在BSRI四个类别中的分布与贝姆的大学生男性常模分布没有显著差异[卡方(3)=2.30,p>0.50],但与贝姆的女性常模分布略有不同[卡方(3)=6.45,p<0.10]。男变女者的分布与大学生女性[卡方(3)=19.71,p<0.001]和男性[卡方(3)=88.72,p<0.0001]的分布均有显著差异,原因是女性化性别类型的男变女者比例非常高。文中呈现了关于BSRI的心理测量数据。将变性者的得分模式与临床文献中的模式进行了比较,并讨论了这些数据对性别认同与性别角色之间关系的启示。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验