Schultze K W
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1980 Feb;40(2):153-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1037210.
Three different models of intrauterine pessaries are compared with each other in respect of tolerance and safety. They were worn for different lengths of time, partly for up to ten years. The comparison shows that the Pearl index in its conventional form is not a suitable indicator. It does provide a pointer if the individual collectives are reduced to the same wearing period. The Life-Table method yields better results. It relates the events for a total of 100 women in each case to the same interval periods. This shows that the most favourable rate of complications and quota of failures is obtained with Cu-T 200. During the first three years this quota decreases steadily. Hence it is recommended to effect intrauterine contraception according to this model wherever suitable and to allow Cu-T to be retained in position for at least three years if it is well tolerated.
就耐受性和安全性而言,对三种不同型号的子宫托进行了相互比较。佩戴时间长短不一,部分长达十年。比较表明,传统形式的 Pearl 指数不是一个合适的指标。如果将各个群体缩短到相同的佩戴时间,它确实能提供一个指示。生命表法产生了更好的结果。它将每种情况下总共 100 名女性的事件与相同的间隔期相关联。这表明使用 Cu-T 200 时并发症发生率和失败率最为有利。在头三年中,这个比率稳步下降。因此,建议在合适的情况下根据这种型号进行宫内避孕,如果耐受性良好,应让 Cu-T 在原位保留至少三年。