Naylor H, Lambert N M, Sassone D M, Hardyck C
Int J Neurosci. 1980;10(2-3):135-43. doi: 10.3109/00207458009160492.
Three groups of 11 year old boys, classified as reading-disabled/hyperactive, hyperactive, and normal controls, made same-different judgments to pairs of verbal or visuospatial stimuli presented simultaneously to the right or left side of a fixation point. Two experimental paradigms were used, one emphasizing comparison judgments from memory, the other, new comparison judgments. Reading-disabled boys made more errors of judgment than did controls. All subjects exhibited faster reaction times for different judgments of pairs appearing in the left visual field. Reaction times were longer and errors more numerous for judgments made when two stimuli were presented simultaneously, one to each visual field. Differences in performance for the two halves of the visual field are attributed to memory storage effects for overlearned stimuli. The deficiency in interhemispheric comparisons is attributed to immaturity of the cerebral commissures. The reading-disabled group appears to encompass two subgroups with differing modes of information processing.
将11岁男孩分为三组:阅读障碍/多动组、多动组和正常对照组,让他们对同时呈现于注视点右侧或左侧的成对言语或视觉空间刺激做出相同或不同的判断。采用了两种实验范式,一种强调基于记忆的比较判断,另一种是新的比较判断。阅读障碍男孩比对照组做出更多的判断错误。所有受试者对出现在左视野的成对刺激做出不同判断时反应时间更快。当两个刺激同时呈现,分别呈现于每个视野时,做出判断的反应时间更长且错误更多。视野两半部分表现的差异归因于过度学习刺激的记忆存储效应。半球间比较的缺陷归因于大脑连合的不成熟。阅读障碍组似乎包含两个信息处理模式不同的亚组。