• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于标准的生理学开卷考试。

Criterion-based open book examinations in physiology.

作者信息

Naeraa N, Huxham G

出版信息

Med Educ. 1980 Mar;14(2):113-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1980.tb02622.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1980.tb02622.x
PMID:7366499
Abstract

Analysed data from ten consecutive physiology examinations for medical students at Aarhus University are presented. Each examination comprised one MCQ test and one short-answer test. For both written aids were allowed; both were dominated by items above the recall level. The mean test scores of both the MCQ and the short answer tests were slightly above their mean pass levels with coefficients of variation around seven. Large but similar pass rate fluctuations in both test were found, and about half of the non-passing students failed both tests. The MCQ minimum pass level, established by the Nedelsky principle, was more stable than the essay pass level. The Nedelsky values seem to compensate for a large part of the fluctuations in the difficulty level of various MCQ sets. Due to lack of comparable data it cannot be settled whether the pass rate fluctuations are excessive, nor whether standards fluctuate more than those at other institutes.

摘要

本文呈现了对奥胡斯大学医学院学生连续十次生理学考试的数据分析结果。每次考试包括一场多项选择题测试和一场简答题测试。两场考试均允许使用书面辅助工具;两者都以高于记忆水平的题目为主。多项选择题测试和简答题测试的平均成绩略高于各自的平均及格水平,变异系数约为7。发现两场考试的及格率波动都很大,但波动情况相似,约一半未通过的学生两场考试都未通过。通过内德尔斯基原则确定的多项选择题最低及格水平比论述题及格水平更稳定。内德尔斯基值似乎在很大程度上补偿了各种多项选择题集难度水平的波动。由于缺乏可比数据,无法确定及格率波动是否过大,也无法确定标准波动是否比其他机构更大。

相似文献

1
Criterion-based open book examinations in physiology.基于标准的生理学开卷考试。
Med Educ. 1980 Mar;14(2):113-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1980.tb02622.x.
2
Is Bloom's Taxonomy reflected in the response pattern to MCQ items?多项选择题的回答模式是否体现了布鲁姆教育目标分类法?
Med Educ. 1980 Jan;14(1):23-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1980.tb02608.x.
3
Multiple choice question tests in physiology: a preliminary attempt to apply the minimum pass level.生理学中的多项选择题测试:应用最低及格水平的初步尝试。
Med Educ. 1994 Sep;28(5):409-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1994.tb02552.x.
4
A comparative study of students' performance in preclinical physiology assessed by multiple choice and short essay questions.一项关于通过多项选择题和短文问题评估学生临床前生理学表现的比较研究。
Afr J Med Med Sci. 2000 Sep-Dec;29(3-4):201-5.
5
A comparison of student performance in multiple-choice and long essay questions in the MBBS stage I physiology examination at the University of the West Indies (Mona Campus).西印度群岛大学(莫纳校区)医学学士阶段 I 生理学考试中多项选择题和短文问答题中学生表现的比较。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2010 Jun;34(2):86-9. doi: 10.1152/advan.00087.2009.
6
A reappraisal of the use of the phi-coefficient in multiple choice examinations.对多项选择题考试中使用φ系数的重新评估。
Med Educ. 1987 Jan;21(1):46-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1987.tb00513.x.
7
The introduction of single best answer questions as a test of knowledge in the final examination for the fellowship of the Royal College of Radiologists in Clinical Oncology.将单项最佳答案问题引入作为皇家放射科医师学院临床肿瘤学研究员资格期末考试的知识测试。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2008 Oct;20(8):571-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2008.05.010. Epub 2008 Jun 26.
8
Choosing medical assessments: Does the multiple-choice question make the grade?选择医学评估:多项选择题能达标吗?
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2018 May-Aug;31(2):65-71. doi: 10.4103/efh.EfH_229_17.
9
A comparison of student performance in two parallel physiology tests in multiple choice and short answer forms.对以选择题和简答题形式进行的两次平行生理学测试中学生成绩的比较。
Med Educ. 1978 Jul;12(4):290-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1978.tb00353.x.
10
Testing of medical students with open-ended, uncued questions.使用开放式、无提示问题对医学生进行测试。
Hum Pathol. 1995 Apr;26(4):362-5. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(95)90134-5.