Goddard R F, Klein W M, Smith R M
Ann Allergy. 1980 Apr;44(4):206-11.
A comparative study of a new, simple, pneumatic, direct-recording office spirometer versus a long-accepted, water-sealed, water-filled spirometer was performed on 103 patients ranging from four to 20 years of age. Good correlation between the two spirometers was seen through a wide range of values for forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and forced expiratory flow during 25% to 75% of forced vital capacity and FEV1/FVC.
对103名年龄在4至20岁之间的患者,进行了一项新的、简单的、气动的、直接记录式办公室肺量计与长期使用的水封式、充水肺量计的对比研究。在用力肺活量(FVC)、一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)、用力肺活量25%至75%期间的用力呼气流量以及FEV1/FVC的广泛数值范围内,两种肺量计之间呈现出良好的相关性。