Rosenstein S, Brown H D
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1980 Apr 17;629(1):195-8. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(80)90278-0.
Comparative assays were made in a spectrophotometer and a microcalorimeter for the reaction between acetylcholinesterase (EC 3.1.1.7) and acetylthiocholine. The rate of light absorbance change and the rate of heat flow were measured from similar and simultaneous reactions in spectrophotometer and microcalorimeter, respectively. At the enzyme activity levels studied, i.e., 0.05-0.15 I.U. in calorimetry and 1-4 I.U. in spectrophotometry, the reaction rates were linear and showed first-order kinetics A highly significant positive correlation was seen between the two methods (r = 0.997). More importantly, spectrophotometric assay with acetylthiocholine (which utilized a secondary reaction with chromagen, dithiobisnitrobenzoic acid) stood in highly significant positive correlation with calorimetric assays (which did not require a chromagen) either with the same substrate (r = 0.976) or with acetylcholine (r = 0.900). It appears that microcalorimetry can be used in preference to spectrophotometry for enzyme kinetic studies to overcome the complexity of reaction mixture and interference problems and with the advantage of using natural substrates.
使用分光光度计和微量量热仪对乙酰胆碱酯酶(EC 3.1.1.7)与乙酰硫代胆碱之间的反应进行了比较测定。分别在分光光度计和微量量热仪中对相似且同时进行的反应测量吸光度变化速率和热流速率。在所研究的酶活性水平下,即量热法中为0.05 - 0.15国际单位,分光光度法中为1 - 4国际单位,反应速率呈线性且显示一级动力学。两种方法之间存在高度显著的正相关(r = 0.997)。更重要的是,使用乙酰硫代胆碱的分光光度测定法(其利用与显色剂二硫代双硝基苯甲酸的二级反应)与量热测定法(不需要显色剂)无论是使用相同底物(r = 0.976)还是使用乙酰胆碱(r = 0.900)都存在高度显著的正相关。看来在酶动力学研究中,微量量热法可优先于分光光度法使用,以克服反应混合物的复杂性和干扰问题,并具有使用天然底物的优势。