Meites K, Lovallo W, Pishkin V
J Clin Psychol. 1980 Apr;36(2):427-32. doi: 10.1002/jclp.6120360207.
Examined the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), AND THE Taylor Manifest Anxiety Scale (TMAS) for specificity and validity as measures of anxiety and depression. It was hypothesized that if the BDI and SDS were specific to symptoms of depression, they would show high correlations with each other, low correlations with the TMAS, and intermediate correlations with the Neuroticism scale of the Eysenck Personality Inventory (EPI-N). The four instruments were administered to 170 undergraduate students, and correlations and qualitative content analyses showed that the BDI, SDS and TMAS were intercorrelated significantly with the EPI-N scale and that item content overlapped heavily among the tests. The results suggest all four tests tap an emotionality factor of stability-instability.
研究了贝克抑郁量表(BDI)、zung自评抑郁量表(SDS)以及泰勒显性焦虑量表(TMAS)作为焦虑和抑郁测量工具的特异性和有效性。研究假设,如果BDI和SDS对抑郁症状具有特异性,那么它们彼此之间会呈现高相关性,与TMAS呈现低相关性,与艾森克人格问卷神经质量表(EPI-N)呈现中等相关性。对170名本科生施测这四种工具,相关性和定性内容分析表明,BDI、SDS和TMAS与EPI-N量表显著相互关联,且各测试项目内容存在大量重叠。结果表明,所有这四项测试均涉及稳定性-不稳定性的情绪因素。