Suppr超能文献

具有不同过渡起始值的塞音第二共振峰对塞音和鼻音的双耳掩蔽及单耳掩蔽。

Dichotic and monotic masking of CV's by CV second formants with different transition starting values.

作者信息

Porter R J, Whittaker R G

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 1980 May;67(5):1772-80. doi: 10.1121/1.384305.

Abstract

Listeners were asked to identify ambiguous and unambiguous stop-vowel targets placed in monotic and dichotic competition with second formants (bleats) from voiced consonant-vowel (CV) syllables lying along a place-of-articulation continuum. Target performance varied with bleat-continuum position as well as bleat intensities. In cases where target errors occurred, either dichotically or monotically, they reflected predominantly the place cue of the bleat. This result, like that of previous studies, suggests the dominance of target or bleat reflects the relative "salience" of the two signals' cues. Differences were seen between monotic and dichotic conditions in the rate of change in performance with bleat intensity and continuum position. The rate of monotic performance change was a more precipitous (higher slope) function of these variables than was dichotic performance. This difference was interpreted as suggesting that monotic interference includes a peripheral masking component which is sensitive to the relative spectral energies of target and bleat. Dichotic effects, in contrast, seem to primarily reflect the operation of (central) processes which grant different perceptual weights to signals' cues depending on their intensity-dependent saliences. The observation that ambiguity, per se, of the targets (or the CV's from which the bleats were extracted) played little role in predicting results, was interpreted as reflecting a primarily prephonetic (i.e., auditory) locus for both monotic and dichotic interactions.

摘要

研究人员要求听众识别模糊和明确的塞音-元音目标,这些目标与沿发音部位连续体排列的浊辅音-元音(CV)音节的第二共振峰(咩咩声)处于单耳和双耳竞争中。目标表现随咩咩声连续体位置以及咩咩声强度而变化。在出现目标错误的情况下,无论是双耳还是单耳,错误主要反映了咩咩声的部位线索。与之前的研究结果一样,这一结果表明目标或咩咩声的主导地位反映了两种信号线索的相对“显著性”。在单耳和双耳条件下,随着咩咩声强度和连续体位置的变化,表现的变化率存在差异。单耳表现变化率是这些变量的更陡峭(更高斜率)的函数,而双耳表现则不然。这种差异被解释为表明单耳干扰包括一个外周掩蔽成分,该成分对目标和咩咩声的相对频谱能量敏感。相比之下,双耳效应似乎主要反映了(中枢)过程的运作,这些过程根据信号线索的强度依赖性显著性赋予它们不同的感知权重。目标(或从中提取咩咩声的CV)本身的模糊性在预测结果中作用不大,这一观察结果被解释为反映了单耳和双耳相互作用主要发生在语音前(即听觉)层面。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验