Holman E W
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1980 Apr;6(2):126-36.
In four experiments, rats were trained to associate one cue with one incentive and another cue with a different incentive. Experiment 1 used food and water as the incentives, and Experiments 2-4 used arbitrarily flavored sugar solutions as the incentives; Experiments 1-3 used flavor cues, and Experiment 4 used exteroceptive cues. Preference between the cues was tested under deprivation conditions different from training. With flavor cues, the rats preferred the cue for the incentive with which they were not satiated in the test (Experiments 1 and 2), but they showed no tendency to prefer the cue for the incentive with which they had not been satiated during training (Experiments 2 and 3). With exteroceptive cues, on the other hand, preference in the test depended upon satiation during training but not upon satiation in the test (Experiment 4). These results indicate latent learning but no learning of a habit with flavor cues, and learning of a habit but no latent learning with exteroceptive cues.
在四项实验中,训练大鼠将一种线索与一种奖励联系起来,将另一种线索与另一种不同的奖励联系起来。实验1使用食物和水作为奖励,实验2 - 4使用任意调味的糖溶液作为奖励;实验1 - 3使用气味线索,实验4使用外部感受线索。在与训练不同的剥夺条件下测试线索之间的偏好。对于气味线索,大鼠在测试中更喜欢与未饱足的奖励相关联的线索(实验1和2),但它们没有表现出更喜欢与训练期间未饱足的奖励相关联的线索的倾向(实验2和3)。另一方面,对于外部感受线索,测试中的偏好取决于训练期间的饱足状态,而不是测试期间的饱足状态(实验4)。这些结果表明,对于气味线索存在潜在学习但没有习惯学习,对于外部感受线索存在习惯学习但没有潜在学习。