Malamuth N M, Feshbach S, Heim M
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980 Mar;38(3):413-5. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.38.3.413.
The three ethical issues raised by Sherif are discussed. In response to the first issue, we recognize the need to measure the effectiveness of our attempts to counteract possible undesirable effects of the research materials. Problems that arise in implementing such an assessment are considered. Also discussed is the possibility that exposure to such materials combined with an effective discrediting communication may have beneficial effects. In addressing the second issue, it is argued that Sherif's criticisms of our alternative data interpretations are unfounded. Finally, Sherif's suggestion to formalize the process of having investigators consider the social policy implications of their research is whole-heartedly supported.
讨论了谢里夫提出的三个伦理问题。针对第一个问题,我们认识到有必要衡量我们为抵消研究材料可能产生的不良影响而做出的努力的有效性。考虑了实施这种评估时出现的问题。还讨论了接触此类材料并结合有效的诋毁性沟通可能产生有益效果的可能性。在解决第二个问题时,有人认为谢里夫对我们替代数据解释的批评是没有根据的。最后,我们全心全意地支持谢里夫关于将让研究人员考虑其研究的社会政策影响的过程正规化的建议。