Rosselli Del Turco M, Giannardi G, Villari N
Tumori. 1980 Feb;66(1):85-92. doi: 10.1177/030089168006600109.
The diagnostic efficacy of mammography and physical examination, separately and considered together, are evaluated in 912 cases of breast cancer detected at the Center for Social Diseases of the Florence District, where there is a mass-screening program (110 cases) and a diagnostic service for self-referred women (810 cases). The overall sensitivity of the 2 methods increases with age; the trends of diagnostic efficacies of mammography and palpation according to age are similar, except in the 40-44 year age group, in which physical examination has a lower percentage of false-negative cases. In the screening group, there is a greater proportion of nonpalpable cancers and mammography has a larger diagnostic efficacy except in the 40-44 year age group. These results agree with the better sensitivity of mammography in smaller lesion (TI) and with the larger proportion of noninterpretable mammographies in younger women, because of the density of mammalian glands.
在佛罗伦萨地区社会疾病中心对912例乳腺癌病例进行了评估,分别及综合考量乳腺X线摄影和体格检查的诊断效能。该中心设有大规模筛查项目(110例)以及针对自行前来就诊女性的诊断服务(810例)。两种方法的总体敏感性随年龄增长而增加;乳腺X线摄影和触诊的诊断效能随年龄的变化趋势相似,但在40 - 44岁年龄组中,体格检查的假阴性病例百分比更低。在筛查组中,不可触及的癌症比例更高,除40 - 44岁年龄组外,乳腺X线摄影的诊断效能更大。这些结果与乳腺X线摄影在较小病变(TI)中具有更高敏感性以及年轻女性中因乳腺腺体密度导致乳腺X线摄影难以解读的比例更高相一致。