• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有或无乳腺钼靶的乳腺癌筛查方式假阴性率的比较:宫城试验

Comparison of false negative rates among breast cancer screening modalities with or without mammography: Miyagi trial.

作者信息

Ohuchi N, Yoshida K, Kimura M, Ouchi A, Shiiba K, Ohnuki K, Fukao A, Abe R, Matsuno S, Mori S

机构信息

Second Department of Surgery, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai.

出版信息

Jpn J Cancer Res. 1995 May;86(5):501-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1995.tb03084.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1349-7006.1995.tb03084.x
PMID:7790323
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5920851/
Abstract

False negative rates were compared in two screening modalities, physical examination with or without mammography, in an intervention study for women aged over 50 in Miyagi Prefecture. Thirty-five breast cancers were detected in 12,515 subjects who participated in the trial consisting of physical examination and mammography, whereas 44 breast cancers were detected in 50,105 subjects who received physical examination alone, so that the detection rates were 0.28% and 0.09%, respectively. Among 50,061 subjects who received physical examination alone, 8 women were diagnosed as having breast cancer within 12 months after the screening, while only one of 12,480 screenees receiving the combined modality was so diagnosed, implying false negative rates of 15.4% and 2.8%, respectively. When the screening sensitivity in the combined system was analyzed according to each single modality, the false negative rate provided by physical examination with mammography turned out to be 2.8%, significantly lower than that (33.3%) by the physical examination alone. Minimal breast cancers represented 25.7% of all screen-detected cancers in the combined modality, compared with 9.1% in the modality without mammography. The trial thus indicates that physical examination combined with mammography may be an appropriate modality for breast cancer screening in women aged over 50 on the basis of screening sensitivity.

摘要

在一项针对宫城县50岁以上女性的干预研究中,比较了两种筛查方式(单纯体格检查以及联合乳房X光检查的体格检查)的假阴性率。在12,515名参与了包括体格检查和乳房X光检查的试验的受试者中,检测出35例乳腺癌,而在仅接受体格检查的50,105名受试者中,检测出44例乳腺癌,因此检测率分别为0.28%和0.09%。在仅接受体格检查的50,061名受试者中,8名女性在筛查后12个月内被诊断为患有乳腺癌,而在接受联合检查方式的12,480名受检者中,只有1人被如此诊断,这意味着假阴性率分别为15.4%和2.8%。当根据每种单一方式分析联合系统中的筛查敏感性时,联合乳房X光检查的体格检查所提供的假阴性率为2.8%,显著低于单纯体格检查的假阴性率(33.3%)。在联合检查方式中,微小乳腺癌占所有筛查发现癌症的25.7%,而在未进行乳房X光检查的方式中这一比例为9.1%。因此,该试验表明,基于筛查敏感性,联合乳房X光检查的体格检查可能是50岁以上女性乳腺癌筛查的合适方式。

相似文献

1
Comparison of false negative rates among breast cancer screening modalities with or without mammography: Miyagi trial.有或无乳腺钼靶的乳腺癌筛查方式假阴性率的比较:宫城试验
Jpn J Cancer Res. 1995 May;86(5):501-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1995.tb03084.x.
2
Improved detection rate of early breast cancer in mass screening combined with mammography.在大规模筛查中结合乳房X线摄影提高早期乳腺癌的检出率。
Jpn J Cancer Res. 1993 Jul;84(7):807-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1993.tb02048.x.
3
Evaluation of Adjunctive Ultrasonography for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women Aged 40-49 Years With Varying Breast Density Undergoing Screening Mammography: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.乳腺钼靶筛查中不同乳腺密度的40-49岁女性乳腺癌检测辅助超声检查的评估:一项随机临床试验的二次分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2121505. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.21505.
4
Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.日本50岁以下女性的乳腺钼靶筛查
Anticancer Res. 2000 Sep-Oct;20(5C):3689-94.
5
High detection rate of breast cancer by mass screening using mammography in Japan.在日本,通过乳房X线摄影进行大规模筛查,乳腺癌的检出率很高。
Jpn J Cancer Res. 1994 Dec;85(12):1193-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1994.tb02928.x.
6
Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators.基于荷兰性能指标的召回率对早期乳腺癌筛查检测的影响。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 May 18;97(10):748-54. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji131.
7
Breast cancer survivors' risk of interval cancers and false positive results in organized mammography screening.乳腺癌幸存者在有组织的乳房 X 光筛查中出现间期癌和假阳性结果的风险。
Cancer Med. 2020 Aug;9(16):6042-6050. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3182. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
8
Follow-up and final results of the Oslo I Study comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading.奥斯陆I研究的随访及最终结果:比较屏-片乳腺摄影与软拷贝阅读的全视野数字乳腺摄影。
Acta Radiol. 2005 Nov;46(7):679-89. doi: 10.1080/02841850500223547.
9
Screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years at average risk for breast cancer: an evidence-based analysis.针对40至49岁患乳腺癌平均风险女性的乳腺钼靶筛查:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2007;7(1):1-32. Epub 2007 Jan 1.
10
Interval Breast Cancer Rates and Histopathologic Tumor Characteristics after False-Positive Findings at Mammography in a Population-based Screening Program.基于人群筛查项目中乳腺 X 线摄影假阳性结果后的间期乳腺癌发生率和组织病理学肿瘤特征。
Radiology. 2018 Apr;287(1):58-67. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162159. Epub 2017 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Adjunctive Ultrasonography for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women Aged 40-49 Years With Varying Breast Density Undergoing Screening Mammography: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.乳腺钼靶筛查中不同乳腺密度的40-49岁女性乳腺癌检测辅助超声检查的评估:一项随机临床试验的二次分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2121505. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.21505.
2
Effect of screening mammography on breast cancer survival in comparison to other detection methods: a retrospective cohort study.与其他检测方法相比,乳腺钼靶筛查对乳腺癌生存的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Cancer Sci. 2009 Aug;100(8):1479-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01212.x. Epub 2009 May 12.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening modalities for breast cancer in Japan with special reference to women aged 40-49 years.日本乳腺癌筛查方式的成本效益分析——特别关注40至49岁女性
Cancer Sci. 2006 Nov;97(11):1242-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2006.00296.x. Epub 2006 Aug 17.
4
A case control study on the effectiveness of breast cancer screening by clinical breast examination in Japan.一项关于日本临床乳腺检查对乳腺癌筛查有效性的病例对照研究。
Jpn J Cancer Res. 1999 Jun;90(6):607-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1999.tb00790.x.
5
Effectiveness of mammographic screening for breast cancer in women aged over 50 years in Japan.日本50岁以上女性乳腺钼靶筛查对乳腺癌的有效性。
Jpn J Cancer Res. 1997 Aug;88(8):778-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1997.tb00450.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Improved detection rate of early breast cancer in mass screening combined with mammography.在大规模筛查中结合乳房X线摄影提高早期乳腺癌的检出率。
Jpn J Cancer Res. 1993 Jul;84(7):807-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1993.tb02048.x.
2
The Canadian National Breast Screening Study: a critical review.加拿大国家乳腺筛查研究:一项批判性综述。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993 Oct;161(4):755-60. doi: 10.2214/ajr.161.4.8372752.
3
American Cancer Society guidelines from the past to the present.
Cancer. 1993 Aug 15;72(4 Suppl):1429-32. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930815)72:4+<1429::aid-cncr2820721403>3.0.co;2-n.
4
NCI replaces guidelines with statement of evidence.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994 Jan 5;86(1):14-5. doi: 10.1093/jnci/86.1.14.
5
Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer.乳腺癌筛查国际研讨会报告
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Oct 20;85(20):1644-56. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.20.1644.
6
Screening: assessment of current studies.
Cancer. 1994 Jul 1;74(1 Suppl):231-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.2820741306.
7
Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project: five-year summary report.乳腺癌检测示范项目:五年总结报告
CA Cancer J Clin. 1982 Jul-Aug;32(4):194-225. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.32.4.194.
8
Proceedings: Treatment of minimal breast cancer.会议记录:微小乳腺癌的治疗
Cancer. 1974 Feb;33(2):349-57. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197402)33:2<349::aid-cncr2820330208>3.0.co;2-4.
9
Analysis of breast cancer mortality and stage distribution by age for the Health Insurance Plan clinical trial.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1988 Sep 21;80(14):1125-32. doi: 10.1093/jnci/80.14.1125.
10
Breast cancer incidence and mortality in the breast cancer detection demonstration project [published errtum appears in J Natl Cancer Inst 1989 Oct 4;81(19):1513].
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1988 Dec 7;80(19):1540-7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/80.19.1540.