Suppr超能文献

恶喹酸和萘啶酸对常见尿路病原体的体外活性:一项比较研究。

In vitro activity of oxolinic acid and nalidixic acid against common urinary pathogens: a comparative study.

作者信息

de Rautlin de la Roy Y, Toma V, Bobin B

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 1978;5(9):743-8. doi: 10.1185/03007997809110216.

Abstract

A study was carried out to compare the sensitivity of 500 bacterial strains, isolated from patients with urinary tract infections, to oxolinic acid and nalidixic acid. The results showed that whilst both antibacterial agents were similar in their bacterial spectrum they were not identical in terms of cross-sensitivity or resistance. Where there was a difference in sensitivity, this was always in flavour of oxolinic acid and was particularly evident in the case of Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas, Serratia, Klebsiella, Proteus (especially P. rettgeri), and to a lesser extent Citrobacter.

摘要

开展了一项研究,以比较从尿路感染患者中分离出的500株细菌对恶喹酸和萘啶酸的敏感性。结果表明,虽然这两种抗菌剂的抗菌谱相似,但在交叉敏感性或耐药性方面并不相同。在敏感性存在差异的情况下,总是有利于恶喹酸,在葡萄球菌、假单胞菌、沙雷氏菌、克雷伯菌、变形杆菌(特别是雷氏变形杆菌)的情况下尤为明显,在柠檬酸杆菌的情况下程度较轻。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验