Jones G M, Larsen R E, Lanning N M
J Dairy Sci. 1980 Apr;63(4):579-86. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)82974-2.
Chemical analyses and in vitro fermentations were on three corn silages, four legume-grass silages, and four corn-hay crop silage mixtures which had been fed to sheep for 21 days. In vivo data were collected for voluntary silage intake and apparent digestibility of energy. Forage nutritive value was expressed as digestible energy intake. Multiple regression equations were developed to determine the more reliable methods to evaluate voluntary intake, digestibility, and nutritive value of silage. Equations for quadratic response surfaces accounted for 71 to 79% of variation in in vivo data compared to 54 to 70% of variability accountable by simple linear regression equations. Dry matter, crude protein, cell wall, acid-detergent fiber, and acid-detergent lignin contents of silage accounted for greater variability in silage intake, digestibility, and nutritive value than did any in vitro method either alone or in combination with chemical analysis. The results support Crampton's concept of nutritive value index, which is now expressed in the relative feed value system proposed by the American Forage and Grassland Council for differences between forages.
对三种玉米青贮饲料、四种豆科牧草青贮饲料以及四种玉米-干草作物青贮饲料混合物进行了化学分析和体外发酵,这些饲料已喂羊21天。收集了体内数据,包括青贮饲料的自愿摄入量和能量表观消化率。饲料营养价值以可消化能量摄入量表示。建立了多元回归方程,以确定评估青贮饲料自愿摄入量、消化率和营养价值的更可靠方法。与简单线性回归方程可解释的54%至70%的变异性相比,二次响应面方程解释了体内数据中71%至79%的变异性。青贮饲料的干物质、粗蛋白、细胞壁、酸性洗涤纤维和酸性洗涤木质素含量,比单独使用任何体外方法或与化学分析相结合的方法,在青贮饲料摄入量、消化率和营养价值方面造成的变异性更大。结果支持克兰普顿的营养价值指数概念,该概念现在在美国饲料与草地协会提出的相对饲料价值体系中表示饲料之间的差异。