Suppr超能文献

不良事件报告的可靠性。

The reliability of reporting adverse experiences.

作者信息

Steele G P, Henderson S, Duncan-Jones P

出版信息

Psychol Med. 1980 May;10(2):301-6. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700044056.

Abstract

The reliability of reporting of life-events was examined in 52 subjects attending clinics. An inventory of events and longer-standing difficulties was administered on 2 occasions, 7-14 days apart. High levels of reliability were found for the number of events, the mean score for distress or change over all events, and for the single event with highest score. The reporting of individual events was less reliable: only 70% of those events reported at either interview were reported under the same heading at both interviews. Subjective reactions to events differ in reliability according to the type of response, and they are less reliable for single events than overall. Lastly, the reliability of highly distressing events in fact lower than for the less distressing. These findings point to some of the shortcomings of inventory methods in life-event research.

摘要

对52名就诊患者报告生活事件的可靠性进行了检查。对一系列事件和长期存在的困难进行了两次问卷调查,两次调查间隔7 - 14天。结果发现,事件数量、所有事件的痛苦或变化平均得分以及得分最高的单个事件的可靠性都很高。单个事件的报告可靠性较低:在两次访谈中,只有70%在任何一次访谈中报告的事件在两次访谈中都列在同一标题下。对事件的主观反应根据反应类型的不同而具有不同的可靠性,单个事件的可靠性低于总体情况。最后,高度痛苦事件的可靠性实际上低于不太痛苦的事件。这些发现指出了生活事件研究中问卷调查方法的一些缺点。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验