Lakey B, Heller K
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1985 Dec;49(6):1662-8. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.49.6.1662.
This research was an investigation of whether reporting biases can account for the correlation between negative life events (as measured via life events questionnaires) and subclinical psychological symptoms. Subjects completed two life events scales, a measure of psychological symptoms, a measure of depression, and a measure of social desirability. Friends were asked to report about life events experienced by the subjects. No evidence was found for a subject reporting bias associated with social desirability, depression, or symptoms. In fact, for one of the life events scales, depression was significantly associated with a higher rate of agreement between subjects and friends as to which negative events occurred to subjects. Moreover, there were significant correlations between symptom and depression measures and life events measures that were free of subject-reporting biases (subjects' negative life events reported by both subjects and their significant others, as well as subjects' negative life events as reported by significant others alone). These data suggest that response biases may not be able to account for the relation between negative events and psychological symptoms. Thus the hypothesis that negative life events play a significant role in symptom development remains plausible.
本研究旨在调查报告偏倚是否能够解释负性生活事件(通过生活事件问卷进行测量)与亚临床心理症状之间的相关性。受试者完成了两个生活事件量表、一个心理症状测量量表、一个抑郁测量量表以及一个社会赞许性测量量表。研究要求受试者的朋友报告受试者所经历的生活事件。未发现与社会赞许性、抑郁或症状相关的受试者报告偏倚证据。事实上,对于其中一个生活事件量表,在哪些负性事件发生在受试者身上这一问题上,抑郁与受试者和朋友之间更高的一致性显著相关。此外,在不存在受试者报告偏倚的情况下(受试者及其重要他人报告的受试者负性生活事件,以及仅由重要他人报告的受试者负性生活事件),症状测量量表、抑郁测量量表与生活事件测量量表之间存在显著相关性。这些数据表明,反应偏倚可能无法解释负性事件与心理症状之间的关系。因此,负性生活事件在症状发展中起重要作用这一假设仍然合理。