• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

偏执狂(单纯妄想性障碍)的疾病分类学有效性。一篇综述。

The nosologic validity of paranoia (simple delusional disorder). A review.

作者信息

Kendler K S

出版信息

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1980 Jun;37(6):699-706. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1980.01780190097012.

DOI:10.1001/archpsyc.1980.01780190097012
PMID:7387341
Abstract

The diagnostic status of paranoia (renamed simple delusional disorder [SDD]) has been debated since the time of Kraepelin. Three main views have emerged that consider paranoia (1) a subtype of schizophrenia, (2) a subtype of affective illness, or (3) a distinct nosologic entity. The literature pertinent to the diagnostic validity of a SDD is examined. Although the methodology of a number of the studies reviewed would not be considered rigorous by today's standards, certain tentative conclusions can nonetheless be reached. The available data do not suggest that SDD is a subtype of affective illness. The evidence reviewed also does not strongly support the hypothesis that SDD is a subtype of schizophrenia. Although some of the data is consistent with the view that SDD is a "mild" form of schizophrenia, the bulk of the evidence suggests that SDD and schizophrenia are distinct syndromes.

摘要

自克雷佩林时代起,偏执狂(现更名为单纯妄想障碍[SDD])的诊断地位就一直存在争议。出现了三种主要观点,认为偏执狂(1)是精神分裂症的一种亚型,(2)是情感性疾病的一种亚型,或(3)是一种独特的疾病分类实体。本文对与单纯妄想障碍诊断有效性相关的文献进行了研究。尽管按照当今的标准,所综述的一些研究方法并不被认为严谨,但仍可得出某些初步结论。现有数据并不表明单纯妄想障碍是情感性疾病的一种亚型。所综述的证据也并不强烈支持单纯妄想障碍是精神分裂症一种亚型的假说。尽管一些数据与单纯妄想障碍是精神分裂症“轻度”形式的观点一致,但大量证据表明单纯妄想障碍和精神分裂症是不同的综合征。

相似文献

1
The nosologic validity of paranoia (simple delusional disorder). A review.偏执狂(单纯妄想性障碍)的疾病分类学有效性。一篇综述。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1980 Jun;37(6):699-706. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1980.01780190097012.
2
Clinical characteristics of late-onset schizophrenia and delusional disorder.迟发性精神分裂症和妄想障碍的临床特征。
Schizophr Bull. 1993;19(4):701-7. doi: 10.1093/schbul/19.4.701.
3
[Paranoia].
Ugeskr Laeger. 2007 Oct 15;169(42):3566-70.
4
A plea for paraphrenia.对类偏狂的呼吁。
Can J Psychiatry. 1991 Nov;36(9):667-72. doi: 10.1177/070674379103600908.
5
Hypothesis: grandiosity and guilt cause paranoia; paranoid schizophrenia is a psychotic mood disorder; a review.假设:夸大与内疚导致偏执狂;偏执型精神分裂症是一种精神病性心境障碍;一篇综述。
Schizophr Bull. 2008 Nov;34(6):1151-62. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbm132. Epub 2007 Dec 1.
6
Nosology of paranoid schizophrenia and other paranoid psychoses.偏执型精神分裂症及其他偏执性精神病的疾病分类学
Schizophr Bull. 1981;7(4):594-610. doi: 10.1093/schbul/7.4.594.
7
100 years of DSM-III paranoia. How stable a diagnosis over time?《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)中关于偏执狂的百年研究。随着时间推移,该诊断的稳定性如何?
Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci. 1986;235(4):255-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00379981.
8
Nonschizophrenic paranoid syndromes.非精神分裂症性偏执综合征
Schizophr Bull. 1980;6(4):627-32. doi: 10.1093/schbul/6.4.627.
9
Paranoid delusions in schizophrenia spectrum disorders and depression: the transdiagnostic role of expectations of negative events and negative self-esteem.精神分裂症谱系障碍和抑郁症中的偏执妄想:负面事件预期和负面自尊的跨诊断作用。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2008 May;196(5):375-83. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31817108db.
10
The paranoid and the schizophrenic: the case for distinct cognitive style.偏执症患者与精神分裂症患者:关于不同认知风格的案例
Schizophr Bull. 1981;7(4):632-61. doi: 10.1093/schbul/7.4.632.

引用本文的文献

1
Profiles of Genetic Risks for Psychotic Disorders.精神障碍的遗传风险概况。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 9. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.1289.
2
Taking an Evidence-Based Approach to 10 Common Myths About Catatonia: An Educational Review.采用循证方法解读关于紧张症的10个常见误区:一项教育性综述
J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry. 2025 May 29. doi: 10.1016/j.jaclp.2025.05.008.
3
Exhaustion Disorder in Primary Care: A Comparison With Major Depressive Disorder and Adjustment Disorder.基层医疗中的精疲力竭障碍:与重度抑郁症和适应障碍的比较。
Scand J Psychol. 2025 Jun;66(3):315-326. doi: 10.1111/sjop.13087. Epub 2024 Dec 8.
4
The future of diagnosis in clinical neurosciences: Comparing multiple sclerosis and schizophrenia.临床神经科学诊断的未来:多发性硬化症与精神分裂症的比较。
Eur Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 21;66(1):e58. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.2432.
5
Revisiting the concept of bipolar depression: comparison of diagnostic validators between melancholic and non-melancholic episodes.重新审视双相抑郁的概念:在忧郁和非忧郁发作之间比较诊断验证器。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024 Apr;274(3):507-514. doi: 10.1007/s00406-022-01546-x. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
6
The predictive validity and outcome of ICD-10 and DSM-5 short-lived psychotic disorders: a review and meta-analysis.ICD-10 和 DSM-5 短暂性精神病障碍的预测效度和结局:综述和荟萃分析。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2022 Oct;272(7):1157-1168. doi: 10.1007/s00406-021-01356-7. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
7
The role of dopamine dysregulation and evidence for the transdiagnostic nature of elevated dopamine synthesis in psychosis: a positron emission tomography (PET) study comparing schizophrenia, delusional disorder, and other psychotic disorders.多巴胺失调的作用以及精神病中多巴胺合成升高的跨诊断性质的证据:一项正电子发射断层扫描(PET)研究,比较精神分裂症、妄想障碍和其他精神病性障碍。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2020 Oct;45(11):1870-1876. doi: 10.1038/s41386-020-0740-x. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
8
Close Reading of Old Texts-Towards a Psychiatric Hermeneutics.旧文本的细读——迈向精神医学诠释学
Schizophr Bull. 2020 Apr 10;46(3):455-457. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbaa017.
9
Can psychopathology and neuroscience coexist in psychiatric classifications?精神病理学与神经科学能否在精神疾病分类中共存?
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2018 Sep;20(3):155-160. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2018.20.3/macrocq.
10
Concordance between the diagnostic guidelines for alcohol and cannabis use disorders in the draft ICD-11 and other classification systems: analysis of data from the WHO's World Mental Health Surveys.酒精和大麻使用障碍诊断指南在 ICD-11 草案与其他分类系统之间的一致性:来自世界卫生组织世界心理健康调查的数据分析。
Addiction. 2019 Mar;114(3):534-552. doi: 10.1111/add.14482. Epub 2018 Dec 9.