Searles H F
Int J Psychoanal Psychother. 1978;7:165-88.
This paper is presented primarily for its historical interest. The author's first attempted publication in psychiatry or psychoanalysis, it was submitted successively to two publications in 1949, rejected by each, and filed away until now. In it, the author suggests that transference phenomena constitute projections, and that all projective manifestations-including transference reactions-have some real basis in the analyst's behavior and represent, therefore, distortions in degree only. The latter of these two suggestions implies a degree of emotional participation by the analyst which is not adequately described by the classical view of him as manifesting sympathetic interest, and nothing else, toward the patient. It has been the writer's experience that the analyst actually does feel, and manifest in various ways, a great variety of emotions during the analytic hour. The analytic usefulness of this actual richness of emotional participation, by the analyst, is detailed.
本文主要因其历史意义而被呈现。这是作者在精神病学或精神分析领域首次尝试发表的作品，于1949年先后提交给两家出版物，均被拒绝，之后便被束之高阁直至如今。在文中，作者提出移情现象构成投射，并且所有投射表现——包括移情反应——在分析师的行为中都有某种现实基础，因此仅仅是程度上的扭曲。这两个观点中的后者暗示了分析师的某种情感参与程度，而传统观点认为分析师对患者仅表现出同情兴趣，这不足以描述这种情感参与。根据作者的经验，分析师在分析过程中确实会以各种方式感受到并表现出各种各样的情感。文中详细阐述了分析师这种实际丰富的情感参与在分析中的作用。
